Literature DB >> 25746789

Heterogeneity in European research integrity guidance: relying on values or norms?

Simon Godecharle1, Benoit Nemery1, Kris Dierickx2.   

Abstract

Similar forms of misconduct are perceived differently throughout Europe. There are no extensive surveys on the guidance on research integrity in the different countries of Europe. Therefore, we performed a systematic content analysis of (biomedical) research integrity guidance documents from all the countries of the European Economic Area. We show that there is strong heterogeneity concerning research integrity guidance on crucial aspects, for example, the defining of research misconduct, at both an international and a national level. We also sought to explain why the guidance documents differ by distinguishing the approaches that underlie them. We distinguished a value-based and a norm-based approach, as well as different perspectives on trust. The current confusing situation concerning research integrity guidance hampers international research and possibly wastes research funds. We risk talking past each other, if we do not take the distinction between these underlying approaches into account.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Keywords:  authorship; conflicts of interest; guidance; peer review; prevention; publication ethics; questionable research; research integrity; research misconduct; science policy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25746789     DOI: 10.1177/1556264614540594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  10 in total

1.  Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Simon Godecharle; Benoit Nemery; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.

Authors:  Simon Godecharle; Steffen Fieuws; Ben Nemery; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of 'Scientific Integrity'.

Authors:  S P J M Horbach; W Halffman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland.

Authors:  Priya Satalkar; David Shaw
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Rea Ščepanović; Krishma Labib; Ivan Buljan; Joeri Tijdink; Ana Marušić
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers.

Authors:  Matthias Kaiser; Laura Drivdal; Johs Hjellbrekke; Helene Ingierd; Ole Bjørn Rekdal
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices.

Authors:  Stijn Conix; Andreas De Block; Krist Vaesen
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-11-08

8.  Stakeholders' Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries.

Authors:  Natalie Evans; Ivan Buljan; Emanuele Valenti; Lex Bouter; Ana Marušić; Raymond de Vries; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.777

9.  Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity.

Authors:  Lex M Bouter; Joeri Tijdink; Nils Axelsen; Brian C Martinson; Gerben Ter Riet
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2016-11-21

10.  Critical evaluation of the guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity and of their application.

Authors:  Liisa Räsänen; Erja Moore
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2016-10-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.