Literature DB >> 33501239

Augmented Reality Guided Needle Biopsy of Soft Tissue: A Pilot Study.

David Asgar-Deen1, Jay Carriere1, Ericka Wiebe2, Lashan Peiris3, Aalo Duha4, Mahdi Tavakoli1.   

Abstract

Percutaneous biopsies are popular for extracting suspicious tissue formations (primarily for cancer diagnosis purposes) due to the: relatively low cost, minimal invasiveness, quick procedure times, and low risk for the patient. Despite the advantages provided by percutaneous biopsies, poor needle and tumor visualization is a problem that can result in the clinicians classifying the tumor as benign when it was malignant (false negative). The system developed by the authors aims to address the concern of poor needle and tumor visualization through two virtualization setups. This system is designed to track and visualize the needle and tumor in three-dimensional space using an electromagnetic tracking system. User trials were conducted in which the 10 participants, who were not medically trained, performed a total of 6 tests, each guiding the biopsy needle to the desired location. The users guided the biopsy needle to the desired point on an artificial spherical tumor (diameters of 30, 20, and 10 mm) using the 3D augmented reality (AR) overlay for three trials and a projection on a second monitor (TV) for the other three trials. From the randomized trials, it was found that the participants were able to guide the needle tip 6.5 ± 3.3 mm away from the desired position with an angle deviation of 1.96 ± 1.10° in the AR trials, compared to values of 4.5 ± 2.3 mm and 2.70 ± 1.67° in the TV trials. The results indicate that for simple stationary surgical procedures, an AR display is non-inferior a TV display.
Copyright © 2020 Asgar-Deen, Carriere, Wiebe, Peiris, Duha and Tavakoli.

Entities:  

Keywords:  augmented reality (AR); biopsy; minimally invasive surgery (MIS); needle guidance; oncology

Year:  2020        PMID: 33501239      PMCID: PMC7806065          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  25 in total

Review 1.  Centennial dissertation. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium.

Authors:  L Liberman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Robot-assisted biopsy using ultrasound guidance: initial results from in vitro tests.

Authors:  Joachim Kettenbach; Gernot Kronreif; Michael Figl; Martin Fürst; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Rudolf Hanel; Helmar Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail?

Authors:  R J Jackman; F A Marzoni
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A Robot with an Augmented-Reality Display for Functional Capacity Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Injured Workers.

Authors:  Jason Fong; Renz Ocampo; Douglas P Gros; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2019-06

5.  Real-time registration of 3D to 2D ultrasound images for image-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Derek J Gillies; Lori Gardi; Tharindu De Silva; Shuang-Ren Zhao; Aaron Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study.

Authors:  Elodie Lugez; Hossein Sadjadi; David R Pichora; Randy E Ellis; Selim G Akl; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  The effectiveness of Google GLASS as a vital signs monitor in surgery: A simulation study.

Authors:  Mohammed Husnain Iqbal; Abdullatif Aydin; Alexandra Lowdon; Hamza Ibn Ahmed; Gordon H Muir; M Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 8.  Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Ji Young Lee; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  New technologies for human cancer imaging.

Authors:  John V Frangioni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Towards real time 2D to 3D registration for ultrasound-guided endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Raúl San José Estépar; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Kirby G Vosburgh
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.