Literature DB >> 17235000

Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them.

Ji Hyun Youk1, Eun-Kyung Kim, Min Jung Kim, Ji Young Lee, Ki Keun Oh.   

Abstract

Ultrasonographically (US) guided core needle biopsy is currently recognized as a reliable alternative to surgical biopsy for the histopathologic diagnosis of breast lesions. However, despite advances in biopsy devices and techniques, false-negative diagnoses are unavoidable and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. The most common reasons for false-negative diagnosis are (a) technical or sampling errors, (b) failure to recognize or act on radiologic-histologic discordance, and (c) lack of imaging follow-up after a benign biopsy result. Technical difficulties (eg, poor lesion or needle visualization, deeply located lesions, dense fibrotic tissue) cause inaccurate sampling but can be reduced by using modified standard techniques. Radiologic-histologic correlation is also of critical importance in US-guided core needle biopsy. Radiologic-histologic discordance occurs when the histologic results do not provide a sufficient explanation for the imaging features and indicates that the lesion may not have been sampled adequately, so that repeat biopsy is warranted. Appropriate follow-up imaging is invaluable; even patients with concordant benign findings after US-guided core needle biopsy are directed to undergo follow-up imaging because there may be delays in the recognition of false-negative findings. Optimization of technique, radiologic-histologic correlation, and postbiopsy follow-up protocols are recommended to reduce the occurrence of false-negative diagnosis at US-guided core needle biopsy performed by radiologists. Copyright RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17235000     DOI: 10.1148/rg.271065029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  39 in total

1.  Compensating for Torsion Windup in Steerable Needles.

Authors:  Kyle B Reed
Journal:  Proc IEEE RAS EMBS Int Conf Biomed Robot Biomechatron       Date:  2008-10-19

Review 2.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  G Schueller; C Schueller-Weidekamm; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.

Authors:  Y J Suh; M J Kim; E-K Kim; H J Moon; J Y Kwak; H R Koo; J H Yoon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Diagnostic underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ at percutaneous core needle and vacuum-assisted biopsies of the breast in a Brazilian reference institution.

Authors:  Gustavo Machado Badan; Decio Roveda Júnior; Sebastião Piato; Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury; Mário Sérgio Dantas Campos; Carlos Alberto Ferreira Pecci; Felipe Augusto Trocoli Ferreira; Camila D'Ávila
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

5.  Underestimation of malignancy in biopsy-proven cases of stromal fibrosis.

Authors:  N Malik; S Lad; J M Seely; M E Schweitzer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Image Guidance of Flexible Tip-Steerable Needles.

Authors:  Vinutha Kallem; Noah J Cowan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Robot       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 5.567

7.  A comparison of diagnostic performance of vacuum-assisted biopsy and core needle biopsy for breast microcalcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Chen Huang; Xu Hua Hu; Xiao Ran Wang; Chao Xi Zhou; Fei Fei Wang; Shan Yang; Gui Ying Wang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 8.  Molecular imaging to guide systemic cancer therapy: Illustrative examples of PET imaging cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Austin R Pantel; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Modeling and control of needles with torsional friction.

Authors:  Kyle B Reed; Allison M Okamura; Noah J Cowan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Comparison between fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  M Moschetta; M Telegrafo; D A Carluccio; J P Jablonska; L Rella; Gabriella Serio; M Carrozzo; A A Stabile Ianora; G Angelelli
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.