Literature DB >> 9280243

Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail?

R J Jackman1, F A Marzoni.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine what factors are associated with unsuccessful needle-localized breast biopsy (NLBB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Findings in 280 consecutive nonpalpable breast lesions in 262 women (age range, 27-87 years; mean age, 55 years) who underwent nonstereotactic, mammographically guided, standardized NLBB were retrospectively analyzed according to mammographic lesion type, lesion size, number of lesions per breast, needle type, proximity of needle to lesion, radiologist, specimen size, surgeon, and histologic findings.
RESULTS: Biopsy failed in seven (2.5%) of 280 lesions. Failures were related to lesion type, lesion size, number of lesions per breast, accuracy of needle placement, and volume of tissue removed. Removal of more than one tissue specimen converted failure to success in 14 (67%) of 21 initially missed lesions, all microcalcifications.
CONCLUSION: Unsuccessful NLBB was more likely with two lesions per breast, small lesions, small specimens, and microcalcifications. Piercing such lesions with the localizing needle led to successful biopsy. Removal of more tissue was helpful with missed microcalcifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9280243     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.204.3.9280243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  Presurgical localization of breast abnormalities: an overview and analysis of 202 cases.

Authors:  Mahesh K Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12-30

Review 2.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  G Schueller; C Schueller-Weidekamm; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Precision biopsy of breast microcalcifications: An improvement in surgical excision.

Authors:  You Peng; Zhong-Yao Luo; Jie Ni; Hai-Dong Cui; Bei Lu; Ai-Zhai Xiang; Jun Zhou; Jin-Wang Ding; Wen-Hui Chen; Jing Zhao; Jian-Hua Fang; Pan Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  MRI-guided needle localization of suspicious breast lesions: results of a freehand technique.

Authors:  M A A J van den Bosch; B L Daniel; S Pal; K W Nowels; R L Birdwell; S S Jeffrey; D M Ikeda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities.

Authors:  R R White; T J Halperin; J A Olson ; M S Soo; R C Bentley; H F Seigler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparison of mammographically guided breast biopsy techniques.

Authors:  V Velanovich; F R Lewis; S D Nathanson; V F Strand; G B Talpos; S Bhandarkar; R Elkus; W Szymanski; J J Ferrara
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Gd-labeled glycol chitosan as a pH-responsive magnetic resonance imaging agent for detecting acidic tumor microenvironments.

Authors:  Kido Nwe; Ching-Hui Huang; Andrew Tsourkas
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Radioguided occult lesion localisation versus wire-guided lumpectomy in the treatment of non-palpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Tibor Takács; Attila Paszt; Zsolt Simonka; Szabolcs Abrahám; Bernadett Borda; Aurél Ottlakán; Katalin Ormándi; Máté Lázár; András Vörös; Zsuzsanna Kahán; Gyorgy Lazar
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  Can concurrent core biopsy and fine needle aspiration biopsy improve the false negative rate of sonographically detectable breast lesions?

Authors:  Yao-Lung Kuo; Tsai-Wang Chang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Modern concepts of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its diagnosis through percutaneous biopsy.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.