Literature DB >> 33489336

Accommodative Exercises to Lower Intraocular Pressure.

Thomas J Stokkermans1,2, Jeremy C Reitinger3, George Tye2, Chiu-Yen Kao4, Sangeetha Ragupathy2, Huachun A Wang5, Carol B Toris2,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated how a conscious change in ocular accommodation affects intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular biometrics in healthy adult volunteers of different ages.
METHODS: Thirty-five healthy volunteers without ocular disease or past ocular surgery, and with refractive error between -3.50 and +2.50 diopters, were stratified into 20, 40, and 60 year old (y.o.) age groups. Baseline measurements of central cornea thickness, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle, cornea diameter, pupil size, and ciliary muscle thickness were made by autorefraction and optical coherence tomography (OCT), while IOP was measured by pneumotonometry. Each subject's right eye focused on a target 40 cm away. Three different tests were performed in random order: (1) 10 minutes of nonaccommodation (gazing at the target through lenses that allowed clear vision without accommodating), (2) 10 minutes of accommodation (addition of a minus 3 diopter lens), and (3) 10 minutes of alternating between accommodation and nonaccommodation (1-minute intervals). IOP was measured immediately after each test. A 20-minute rest period was provided between tests. Data from 31 subjects were included in the study. ANOVA and paired t-tests were used for statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Following alternating accommodation, IOP decreased by 0.7 mmHg in the right eye when all age groups were combined (p = 0.029). Accommodation or nonaccommodation alone did not decrease IOP. Compared to the 20 y.o. group, the 60 y.o. group had a thicker ciliary muscle within 75 μm of the scleral spur, a thinner ciliary muscle at 125-300 μm from the scleral spur, narrower anterior chamber angles, shallower anterior chambers, and smaller pupils during accommodation and nonaccommodation (p's < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Alternating accommodation, but not constant accommodation, significantly decreased IOP. This effect was not lost with aging despite physical changes to the aging eye. A greater accommodative workload and/or longer test period may improve the effect.
Copyright © 2020 Thomas J. Stokkermans et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489336      PMCID: PMC7803153          DOI: 10.1155/2020/6613066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2090-004X            Impact factor:   1.909


  30 in total

1.  Absence of pupil response to blur-driven accommodation.

Authors:  N J Phillips; B Winn; B Gilmartin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Accommodation and applanation tonometry.

Authors:  M F ARMALY; M L RUBIN
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1961-03

3.  A study of consensual accommodation.

Authors:  E A W BALL
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1952-11

4.  Pupillary changes associated with accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  H A KNOLL
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1949-08

5.  Lens induced aniso-accommodation.

Authors:  L Marran; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Accommodation-induced intraocular pressure changes in progressing myopes and emmetropes.

Authors:  L Yan; L Huibin; L Xuemin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Measuring changes in ciliary muscle thickness with accommodation in young adults.

Authors:  Laura Ashley Lossing; Loraine T Sinnott; Chiu-Yen Kao; Kathryn Richdale; Melissa D Bailey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  The effect of asymmetrical accommodation on anisometropic amblyopia treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Sonia Toor; Anna Horwood; Patricia Riddell
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 9.  Glaucoma history and risk factors.

Authors:  Charles W McMonnies
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-03-23

10.  Effect of Near Work on Intraocular Pressure in Emmetropes.

Authors:  Aaron Z Priluck; Aidan B Hoie; Robin R High; Vikas Gulati; Deepta A Ghate
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 1.909

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) and Axial Myopia.

Authors:  Dongyan Zhang; Liyin Wang; Le Jin; Yingying Wen; Xuhong Zhang; Liyue Zhang; Hong Zhu; Ziyu Wang; Xin Yu; Chen Xie; Jianping Tong; Ye Shen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 1.974

2.  Comparison Between an Intraocular Lens With Extended Depth of Focus (Tecnis Symfony ZXR00) and a New Monofocal Intraocular Lens With Enhanced Intermediate Vision (Tecnis Eyhance ICB00).

Authors:  Young Joon Jeon; Yisang Yoon; Tae-Im Kim; Kyungmin Koh
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2021-10-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.