Literature DB >> 25190534

Accommodation-induced intraocular pressure changes in progressing myopes and emmetropes.

L Yan1, L Huibin1, L Xuemin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the changes of intraocular pressure (IOP) and anterior eye segment biometric parameters under different accommodative statuses in progressing myopes and emmetropes.
METHODS: Forty-six progressing myopes and 40 emmetropes participated in this study. All the subjects had their IOP and anterior eye segment biometric parameters (including corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle width, and lens thickness) measured using iCare rebound tonometer and VisanteTM anterior segment-optical coherence tomography while accommodative stimuli of 0, 3, and 6D were presented.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in IOP between progressing myopes and emmetropes when no accommodation was induced (16.22±4.11 vs 17.01±3.72, respectively, t=-0.93, P>0.05). However, IOP significantly increased with accommodation in progressing myopes (mean change +1.02±2.07 mm Hg from 0D to 6D, F=5.35, P<0.01), but remained unchanged (mean change -0.76±3.22 mm Hg from 0D to 6D, F=1.46, P>0.05) in emmetropes. Meanwhile, we found that their anterior chamber depth decreased (P<0.01), anterior chamber angle narrowed (P<0.01), and lens thickened (P<0.01) significantly with accommodation, both in progressing myopes and emmetropes.
CONCLUSIONS: Although no difference was detected between the IOPs of progressing myopes and emmetropes without accommodation, accommodation could induce transient IOP elevation in progressing myopes. Simultaneously, we found that their anterior chamber depth decreased, anterior chamber angle narrowed, and lens thickened with accommodation. Although emmetropes showed the similar anterior eye segment structure changes, their IOPs did not increase with accommodation. Our study indicated that IOP elevation with accommodation in progressing myopes might be related to myopia progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190534      PMCID: PMC4274294          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2014.208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  32 in total

1.  Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings.

Authors:  N Feltgen; D Leifert; J Funk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Near-work activity, night-lights, and myopia in the Singapore-China study.

Authors:  Seang-Mei Saw; Ming-Zhi Zhang; Rong-Zhao Hong; Zhi-Fu Fu; Mei-Hua Pang; Donald T H Tan
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05

3.  The effect of accommodation on ocular shape.

Authors:  Terry W Walker; Donald O Mutti
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Diurnal rhythms in intraocular pressure, axial length, and choroidal thickness in a primate model of eye growth, the common marmoset.

Authors:  Debora L Nickla; Christine F Wildsoet; David Troilo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Precision and accuracy of the ICare tonometer - Peripheral and central IOP measurements by rebound tonometry.

Authors:  Danson V Muttuvelu; Kirsten Baggesen; Niels Ehlers
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Diurnal variation of axial length, intraocular pressure, and anterior eye biometrics.

Authors:  Scott A Read; Michael J Collins; D Robert Iskander
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; G Lynn Mitchell; Melvin L Moeschberger; Lisa A Jones; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The relationship between intraocular pressure and refractive error adjusting for age and central corneal thickness.

Authors:  Hideki Nomura; Fujiko Ando; Naoakira Niino; Hiroshi Shimokata; Yozo Miyake
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Evelien Vandewalle; Sofie Vandenbroeck; Ingeborg Stalmans; Thierry Zeyen
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.597

10.  Nearwork induced transient myopia during myopia progression.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Díaz; Niall C Strang; Barry Winn
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.424

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) and Axial Myopia.

Authors:  Dongyan Zhang; Liyin Wang; Le Jin; Yingying Wen; Xuhong Zhang; Liyue Zhang; Hong Zhu; Ziyu Wang; Xin Yu; Chen Xie; Jianping Tong; Ye Shen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 1.974

2.  Intraocular Pressure Changes during Accommodation in Progressing Myopes, Stable Myopes and Emmetropes.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Huibin Lv; Xiaodan Jiang; Xiaodan Hu; Mingzhou Zhang; Xuemin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level is associated with myopia in the Korea national health and nutrition examination survey.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Kwon; Jin A Choi; Tae Yoon La
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  α-adrenergic agonist brimonidine control of experimentally induced myopia in guinea pigs: A pilot study.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Yuexin Wang; Huibin Lv; Xiaodan Jiang; Mingzhou Zhang; Xuemin Li
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.367

5.  Accommodative Exercises to Lower Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Thomas J Stokkermans; Jeremy C Reitinger; George Tye; Chiu-Yen Kao; Sangeetha Ragupathy; Huachun A Wang; Carol B Toris
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Single-vision spectacle use and myopia progression in children with low myopia, a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Pingjun Chang; Li Lin; Jia Qu; Yune Zhao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone.

Authors:  Ahnul Ha; Young Kook Kim; Young Joo Park; Jin Wook Jeoung; Ki Ho Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of Near Work on Intraocular Pressure in Emmetropes.

Authors:  Aaron Z Priluck; Aidan B Hoie; Robin R High; Vikas Gulati; Deepta A Ghate
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Effect of Smartphone Use on Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Eun Ji Lee; Hyunjoong Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Roles of the ocular pressure, pressure-sensitive ion channel, and elasticity in pressure-induced retinal diseases.

Authors:  Ji-Jie Pang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 5.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.