| Literature DB >> 1455749 |
N J Phillips1, B Winn, B Gilmartin.
Abstract
The drive to the pupil constriction associated with near fixation has generally been attributed to accommodation with convergence and fusional convergence having secondary roles. However, our previous investigations have shown that significant changes in accommodation can take place without concomitant pupil response. To investigate further, the present study recorded pupil and accommodation responses to a blur-only accommodative stimulus using a target moved sinusoidally at a range of temporal frequencies. Care was taken to minimise target size change and apparent lateral or vertical target displacement. Results show that pupil response could be very much reduced or absent irrespective of stimulus temporal frequency and despite maintained accommodation response. The results suggest that blur-driven accommodation alone is not sufficient to drive pupil near response and that the presence of cues such as size change and lateral or vertical displacement of an approaching object may be necessary to elicit a response.Mesh:
Year: 1992 PMID: 1455749 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90170-n
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vision Res ISSN: 0042-6989 Impact factor: 1.886