Yicun Wang1, Peter van Gelderen1, Jacco A de Zwart1, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn2, Jeff H Duyn1. 1. Advanced MRI Section, Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 2. Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Low-field (<1 tesla) MRI scanners allow more widespread diagnostic use for a range of cardiac, musculoskeletal, and neurological applications. However, the feasibility of performing robust fMRI at low field has yet to be fully demonstrated. To address this gap, we investigated task-based fMRI using a highly sensitive transition-band balanced steady-state free precession approach and standard EPI on a 0.55 tesla scanner equipped with modern high-performance gradient coils and a receive array. METHODS: TR and flip-angle of transition-band steady-state free precession were optimized for 0.55 tesla by simulations. Static shimming was employed to compensate for concomitant field effects. Visual task-based fMRI data were acquired from 8 healthy volunteers. For comparison, standard EPI data were also acquired with TE = T2∗ . Retrospective image-based correction for physiological effects (RETROICOR) was used to quantify physiological noise effects. RESULTS: Activation was robustly detected using both methods in a 4-min scan time. Transition-band steady-state free precession was found to be sensitive to interference from subtle spatial and temporal (field drift, respiration) variations in the magnetic field, counteracting potential advantages of the reduced magnetic susceptibility effects compared to its utilization at high field. These adverse effects could be partially remedied with static shimming and postprocessing approaches. Standard EPI proved more robust against the sources of interference. CONCLUSION: BOLD contrast is sufficiently large at 0.55 tesla for robust detection of brain activation and may be employed to broaden the spectrum of applications of low-field MRI. Standard EPI outperforms transition-band steady-state free precession in terms of signal stability. Published 2021. This article is a U.S Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
PURPOSE: Low-field (<1 tesla) MRI scanners allow more widespread diagnostic use for a range of cardiac, musculoskeletal, and neurological applications. However, the feasibility of performing robust fMRI at low field has yet to be fully demonstrated. To address this gap, we investigated task-based fMRI using a highly sensitive transition-band balanced steady-state free precession approach and standard EPI on a 0.55 tesla scanner equipped with modern high-performance gradient coils and a receive array. METHODS: TR and flip-angle of transition-band steady-state free precession were optimized for 0.55 tesla by simulations. Static shimming was employed to compensate for concomitant field effects. Visual task-based fMRI data were acquired from 8 healthy volunteers. For comparison, standard EPI data were also acquired with TE = T2∗ . Retrospective image-based correction for physiological effects (RETROICOR) was used to quantify physiological noise effects. RESULTS: Activation was robustly detected using both methods in a 4-min scan time. Transition-band steady-state free precession was found to be sensitive to interference from subtle spatial and temporal (field drift, respiration) variations in the magnetic field, counteracting potential advantages of the reduced magnetic susceptibility effects compared to its utilization at high field. These adverse effects could be partially remedied with static shimming and postprocessing approaches. Standard EPI proved more robust against the sources of interference. CONCLUSION: BOLD contrast is sufficiently large at 0.55 tesla for robust detection of brain activation and may be employed to broaden the spectrum of applications of low-field MRI. Standard EPI outperforms transition-band steady-state free precession in terms of signal stability. Published 2021. This article is a U.S Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Josef Pfeuffer; Gary H Glover; Kamil Ugurbil; Xiaoping Hu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jin Hyung Lee; Serge O Dumoulin; Emine U Saritas; Gary H Glover; Brian A Wandell; Dwight G Nishimura; John M Pauly Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lawrence L Wald; Patrick C McDaniel; Thomas Witzel; Jason P Stockmann; Clarissa Zimmerman Cooley Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-10-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Yicun Wang; Peter van Gelderen; Jacco A de Zwart; Pinar S Özbay; Hendrik Mandelkow; Dante Picchioni; Jeff H Duyn Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 7.400
Authors: Nam G Lee; Rajiv Ramasawmy; Yongwan Lim; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Krishna S Nayak Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 3.737