Literature DB >> 31605435

Low-cost and portable MRI.

Lawrence L Wald1,2,3, Patrick C McDaniel1,4, Thomas Witzel1,2, Jason P Stockmann1,2, Clarissa Zimmerman Cooley1,2.   

Abstract

Research in MRI technology has traditionally expanded diagnostic benefit by developing acquisition techniques and instrumentation to enable MRI scanners to "see more." This typically focuses on improving MRI's sensitivity and spatiotemporal resolution, or expanding its range of biological contrasts and targets. In complement to the clear benefits achieved in this direction, extending the reach of MRI by reducing its cost, siting, and operational burdens also directly benefits healthcare by increasing the number of patients with access to MRI examinations and tilting its cost-benefit equation to allow more frequent and varied use. The introduction of low-cost, and/or truly portable scanners, could also enable new point-of-care and monitoring applications not feasible for today's scanners in centralized settings. While cost and accessibility have always been considered, we have seen tremendous advances in the speed and spatial-temporal capabilities of general-purpose MRI scanners and quantum leaps in patient comfort (such as magnet length and bore diameter), but only modest success in the reduction of cost and siting constraints. The introduction of specialty scanners (eg, extremity, brain-only, or breast-only scanners) have not been commercially successful enough to tilt the balance away from the prevailing model: a general-purpose scanner in a centralized healthcare location. Portable MRI scanners equivalent to their counterparts in ultrasound or even computed tomography have not emerged and MR monitoring devices exist only in research laboratories. Nonetheless, recent advances in hardware and computational technology as well as burgeoning markets for MRI in the developing world has created a resurgence of interest in the topic of low-cost and accessible MRI. This review examines the technical forces and trade-offs that might facilitate a large step forward in the push to "jail-break" MRI from its centralized location in healthcare and allow it to reach larger patient populations and achieve new uses. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 6 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:686-696.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI value; accessible MRI; low-cost MRI; point-of-care MRI; portable MRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31605435     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  25 in total

1.  External Dynamic InTerference Estimation and Removal (EDITER) for low field MRI.

Authors:  Sai Abitha Srinivas; Stephen F Cauley; Jason P Stockmann; Charlotte R Sappo; Christopher E Vaughn; Lawrence L Wald; William A Grissom; Clarissa Z Cooley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  B1 -gradient-based MRI using frequency-modulated Rabi-encoded echoes.

Authors:  Efraín Torres; Taylor Froelich; Paul Wang; Lance DelaBarre; Michael Mullen; Gregory Adriany; Daniel Cosmo Pizetta; Mateus José Martins; Edson Luiz Géa Vidoto; Alberto Tannús; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Development and validation of 3D MP-SSFP to enable MRI in inhomogeneous magnetic fields.

Authors:  Naoharu Kobayashi; Ben Parkinson; Djaudat Idiyatullin; Gregor Adriany; Sebastian Theilenberg; Christoph Juchem; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Yongwan Lim; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Jennifer Steeden
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  FMRI based on transition-band balanced SSFP in comparison with EPI on a high-performance 0.55 T scanner.

Authors:  Yicun Wang; Peter van Gelderen; Jacco A de Zwart; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.737

6.  In vivo T1 and T2 relaxation time maps of brain tissue, skeletal muscle, and lipid measured in healthy volunteers at 50 mT.

Authors:  Thomas O'Reilly; Andrew G Webb
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.737

Review 7.  Approaches in cooling of resistive coil-based low-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) systems for application in low resource settings.

Authors:  Faith Natukunda; Theodora M Twongyirwe; Steven J Schiff; Johnes Obungoloch
Journal:  BMC Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 8.  Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Biosensors for Point-of-Need Diagnosis-Progress and Perspectives.

Authors:  Felix Weihs; Alisha Anderson; Stephen Trowell; Karine Caron
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Neurocysticercosis: Current Perspectives on Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Caitlin Butala; T M Brook; Ayodele O Majekodunmi; Susan Christina Welburn
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-10

10.  ESMRMB annual meeting roundtable discussion: "when less is more: the view of MRI vendors on low-field MRI".

Authors:  Wim van Kemenade; Stefano Gazzo; David Grodzki; Edmond A Knopp; José P Marques; Jeff Stainsby
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.