Literature DB >> 33479344

Automatic recognition of uterine contractions with electrohysterogram signals based on the zero-crossing rate.

Xiaoxiao Song1, Xiangyun Qiao1, Dongmei Hao2, Lin Yang1, Xiya Zhou3, Yuhang Xu4, Dingchang Zheng4.   

Abstract

Uterine contraction (UC) is an essential clinical indicator in the progress of labour and delivery. Electrohysterogram (EHG) signals recorded on the abdomen of pregnant women reflect the uterine electrical activity. This study proposes a novel algorithm for automatic recognition of UCs with EHG signals to improve the accuracy of detecting UCs. EHG signals by electrodes, the tension of the abdominal wall by tocodynamometry (TOCO) and maternal perception were recorded simultaneously in 54 pregnant women. The zero-crossing rate (ZCR) of the EHG signal and its power were calculated to modulate the raw EHG signal and highlight the EHG bursts. Then the envelope was extracted from the modulated EHG for UC recognition. Besides, UC was also detected by the conventional TOCO signal. Taking maternal perception as a reference, the UCs recognized by EHG and TOCO were evaluated with the sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and UC parameters. The results show that the sensitivity and PPV are 87.8% and 93.18% for EHG, and 84.04% and 90.89% for TOCO. EHG detected a larger number of UCs than TOCO, which is closer to maternal perception. The duration and frequency of UC obtained from EHG and TOCO were not significantly different (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the proposed UC recognition algorithm has high accuracy and simple calculation which could be used for real-time analysis of EHG signals and long-term monitoring of UCs.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33479344      PMCID: PMC7820321          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81492-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  26 in total

1.  Comparison of non-invasive electrohysterographic recording techniques for monitoring uterine dynamics.

Authors:  J Alberola-Rubio; G Prats-Boluda; Y Ye-Lin; J Valero; A Perales; J Garcia-Casado
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  A comparison between electrical uterine monitor, tocodynamometer and intra uterine pressure catheter for uterine activity in labor.

Authors:  Eran Hadar; Tal Biron-Shental; Oz Gavish; Oded Raban; Yariv Yogev
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-09-10

3.  Computer analysis of mechanical and electrical uterine activity.

Authors:  J Ramondt; C van Kooten; A Verhoeff; H C Wallenburg
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Uterine contractions clustering based on electrohysterography.

Authors:  Filipa Esgalhado; Arnaldo G Batista; Helena Mouriño; Sara Russo; Catarina R Palma Dos Reis; Fátima Serrano; Valentina Vassilenko; Manuel Ortigueira
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 5.  Clinical assessment of uterine contractions.

Authors:  Wayne R Cohen
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Characterization of abdominally acquired uterine electrical signals in humans, using a non-linear analytic method.

Authors:  William L Maner; Lynette B MacKay; George R Saade; Robert E Garfield
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter.

Authors:  Marion W C Vlemminx; Kirsten M J Thijssen; Galin I Bajlekov; Jeanne P Dieleman; M Beatrijs Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt; S Guid Oei
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  The Impact of Maternal Body Mass Index and Gestational Age on the Detection of Uterine Contractions by Tocodynamometry: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  A Aina-Mumuney; K Hwang; N Sunwoo; I Burd; K Blakemore
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.060

9.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.

Authors:  Tammy Y Euliano; Minh Tam Nguyen; Shalom Darmanjian; Susan P McGorray; Neil Euliano; Allison Onkala; Anthony R Gregg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Evaluation of convolutional neural network for recognizing uterine contractions with electrohysterogram.

Authors:  Dongmei Hao; Jin Peng; Ying Wang; Juntao Liu; Xiya Zhou; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.589

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of Features between Multichannel Electrohysterogram for Differentiation of Labors.

Authors:  Yajun Zhang; Dongmei Hao; Lin Yang; Xiya Zhou; Yiyao Ye-Lin; Yimin Yang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.847

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.