| Literature DB >> 28727889 |
Abstract
The assessment of uterine contractions is important in clinical decision-making, but the precise role for appraising contractions remains controversial. Four clinical approaches to assessing contractions are available: manual palpation; intrauterine pressure determination; external tocodynamometry; and electrohysterography. Palpation is inexpensive and harmless but requires the constant bedside presence of a trained observer. Intrauterine pressure measurement is considered the most sensitive and specific technique, and has become the standard by which other methods are judged; however, its quantitative measurements are not always precise or reproducible. Moreover, the availability of intrauterine pressure measurements does not seem to improve maternal or neonatal outcomes in most situations. External tocodynamometry is the most widely used technique. It is easy to apply and provides reasonably accurate information about the frequency and duration of contractions, but not their amplitude. It can require frequent adjustment during labor and might not work well in patients who are obese. Electrohysterography is a recently available noninvasive technology that detects uterine electrical activity using electrodes placed on the mother's abdominal wall. This approach is at least as reliable and accurate as tocodynamometry.Entities:
Keywords: Electrohysterography; Intrauterine pressure; Labor; Montevideo units; Tocodynamometry; Uterine activity; Uterine contractility
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28727889 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet ISSN: 0020-7292 Impact factor: 3.561