Literature DB >> 25123517

A comparison between electrical uterine monitor, tocodynamometer and intra uterine pressure catheter for uterine activity in labor.

Eran Hadar1, Tal Biron-Shental, Oz Gavish, Oded Raban, Yariv Yogev.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the performance of a non-invasive EMG electrical uterine monitor (EUM) versus tocodynamometry (TOCO) by comparing both to internal uterine pressure catheter (IUPC). STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective observational trial. Uterine activity was recorded continuously and simultaneously, in women during active term labor, with TOCO, EUM and IUPC. Uterine activity tracings were analyzed by three blinded physicians.
RESULTS: Overall, 385 tracings from 43 women were analyzed. A similar rate of interpretable tracings between physicians was demonstrated for EUM (87%; 95% CI 80.9-92.7%) and IUPC (94.8%; 95% CI 83.4-96.3%), with a significantly lower rate for TOCO (67.5%; 95% CI 59.4-76.8%, p < 0.001). There is a significant difference in the contraction frequency for EUM versus IUPC (0.77 ± 2.3) compared to TOCO versus IUPC (-3.34 ± 4.97). There is a high variability between the timing of TOCO contractions as compared to IUPC (4.74 ± 10.03 seconds), while a gap of 8.46 ± 4.24 seconds was detected for EUM. The sensitivity, positive predictive value and false positive rate for individual contraction identification by TOCO and EUM are 54.0%, 84.4%, 15.6% and 94.2%, 87.6%, 12.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: EUM is efficient as IUPC for uterine activity assessment and both techniques are superior in comparison to external tocodynamometry. Our results support the use of non-invasive EMG technology to monitor uterine activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contractions; EMG; electrical uterine monitor; internal uterine pressure catheter; labor; tocodynamometer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123517     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.954539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  8 in total

1.  Monitoring uterine contractility in mice using a transcervical intrauterine pressure catheter.

Authors:  Michael F Robuck; Christine M O'Brien; Kelsi M Knapp; Sheila D Shay; James D West; J M Newton; James C Slaughter; Bibhash C Paria; Jeff Reese; Jennifer L Herington
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Alvarez waves in pregnancy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sara Russo; Arnaldo Batista; Filipa Esgalhado; Catarina R Palma Dos Reis; Fátima Serrano; Valentina Vassilenko; Manuel Ortigueira
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-07-08

3.  Robust Characterization of the Uterine Myoelectrical Activity in Different Obstetric Scenarios.

Authors:  Javier Mas-Cabo; Yiyao Ye-Lin; Javier Garcia-Casado; Alba Díaz-Martinez; Alfredo Perales-Marin; Rogelio Monfort-Ortiz; Alba Roca-Prats; Ángel López-Corral; Gema Prats-Boluda
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  Automatic recognition of uterine contractions with electrohysterogram signals based on the zero-crossing rate.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Song; Xiangyun Qiao; Dongmei Hao; Lin Yang; Xiya Zhou; Yuhang Xu; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A Novel, Cardiac-Derived Algorithm for Uterine Activity Monitoring in a Wearable Remote Device.

Authors:  Muhammad Mhajna; Boaz Sadeh; Simcha Yagel; Christof Sohn; Nadav Schwartz; Steven Warsof; Yael Zahar; Amit Reches
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-19

6.  A Comparative Study of Vaginal Labor and Caesarean Section Postpartum Uterine Myoelectrical Activity.

Authors:  Alba Diaz-Martinez; Javier Mas-Cabo; Gema Prats-Boluda; Javier Garcia-Casado; Karen Cardona-Urrego; Rogelio Monfort-Ortiz; Angel Lopez-Corral; Maria De Arriba-Garcia; Alfredo Perales; Yiyao Ye-Lin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives.

Authors:  Kirsten M J Thijssen; Marion W C Vlemminx; Michelle E M H Westerhuis; Jeanne P Dieleman; M Beatrijs Van der Hout-Van der Jagt; S Guid Oei
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2018-09-14

8.  A Preliminary Exploration of the Placental Position Influence on Uterine Electromyography Using Fractional Modelling.

Authors:  Müfit Şan; Arnaldo Batista; Sara Russo; Filipa Esgalhado; Catarina R Palma Dos Reis; Fátima Serrano; Manuel Ortigueira
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.