Literature DB >> 26499394

The Impact of Maternal Body Mass Index and Gestational Age on the Detection of Uterine Contractions by Tocodynamometry: A Retrospective Study.

A Aina-Mumuney1, K Hwang2, N Sunwoo2, I Burd3, K Blakemore3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of maternal body mass index (BMI) and gestational age (GA) on uterine contraction detection by tocodynamometry.
METHODS: Gravidas with preterm labor (PTL) complaints who were evaluated by tocodynamometry, discharged from Labor and Delivery triage, and subsequently readmitted for preterm delivery were studied. Forty-six patients in whom contractions were detected (group 1) were compared to 49 women in whom contractions were not detected (group 2) with respect to BMI and GA at both evaluation and delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.
RESULTS: Group 2 had a higher mean BMI (31.7 vs 26.1, P < .001), were more likely to be obese (57.1% vs 19.6%, P < .001), and were more likely to have been evaluated in the mid-trimester (36.7% vs 17.4%, P = .04) compared to group 1. Independent risk factors for the inability of the tocodynamometer to detect contractions were obesity (odds ratio [OR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07-0.46) and evaluation in the mid-trimester (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.84).
CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that the effectiveness of tocodynamometry diminishes with increasing maternal BMI. Efficacy of tocodynamometry is also decreased at earlier GA, most pronounced below 25 weeks. To evaluate women with PTL symptoms in the mid-trimester or symptomatic obese women at any GA, a modality other than tocodynamometry could be valuable to more accurately assess uterine activity.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass index; effectiveness of tocodynamometer; midtrimester loss; preterm labor; uterine monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26499394      PMCID: PMC5933158          DOI: 10.1177/1933719115611754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  17 in total

1.  Second-trimester loss and subsequent pregnancy outcomes: What is the real risk?

Authors:  Andrea G Edlow; Sindhu K Srinivas; Michal A Elovitz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  An external tocodynamometer: adjunct to monitoring labor.

Authors:  R C Cefalo; D R Knab; M M Quigley
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  ACOG practice bulletin no. 127: Management of preterm labor.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Morbid obesity and intra-partum care.

Authors:  A Ray; A Hildreth; U I Esen
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 7.  Second trimester pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Thomas C Michels; Alvin Y Tiu
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 8.  Overweight and obesity in mothers and risk of preterm birth and low birth weight infants: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Sarah D McDonald; Zhen Han; Sohail Mulla; Joseph Beyene
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-07-20

9.  Maternal obesity, uterine activity, and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  Hugh M Ehrenberg; Jay D Iams; Robert L Goldenberg; Roger B Newman; Steven J Weiner; Baha M Sibai; Steve N Caritis; Menachem Miodovnik; Mitchell P Dombrowski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.

Authors:  Tammy Y Euliano; Minh Tam Nguyen; Shalom Darmanjian; Susan P McGorray; Neil Euliano; Allison Onkala; Anthony R Gregg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  Vaginal electrohysterography: the design and preliminary evaluation of a novel device for uterine contraction monitoring in an ovine model (.).

Authors:  Nate Sunwoo; Karin Hwang; Karin J Blakemore; Abimbola Aina-Mumuney
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-11-23

2.  Automatic recognition of uterine contractions with electrohysterogram signals based on the zero-crossing rate.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Song; Xiangyun Qiao; Dongmei Hao; Lin Yang; Xiya Zhou; Yuhang Xu; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A Preliminary Exploration of the Placental Position Influence on Uterine Electromyography Using Fractional Modelling.

Authors:  Müfit Şan; Arnaldo Batista; Sara Russo; Filipa Esgalhado; Catarina R Palma Dos Reis; Fátima Serrano; Manuel Ortigueira
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.