Literature DB >> 33479075

Cui bono? PEG feeding.

Heather Parr1, David S Sanders2.   

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) provides long-term nutritional support to those unable to tolerate intake orally. The benefits of a PEG depend on the indication and the individual, and are considered when it has the potential to improve mortality, nutritional status or quality of life. Often, family members and healthcare professionals have to act on behalf of the patient. It is difficult for their personal values and emotions to not be a factor when deciding if to proceed with a PEG. This may result in unnecessary PEG placement. For certain indications (dementia for example), there is limited evidence of any benefits a PEG may give and may actually cause harm. Guidance to improve patient selection and increase education for healthcare professionals is essential in achieving the best outcome for the patient. © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PEG; ethics; nutrition

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33479075      PMCID: PMC7850222          DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  25 in total

1.  Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia.

Authors:  D S Sanders; M J Carter; J D'Silva; G James; R P Bolton; K D Bardhan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  National survey evaluating service provision for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy within the UK.

Authors:  Matthew Kurien; David Westaby; Chris Romaya; David S Sanders
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 3.  Factors Contributing to the Preferred Method of Feeding in End-Stage Dementia: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Roger D Newman; Robin Ray; Lynn Woodward; Beverley Glass
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances.

Authors:  Claudio A R Gomes; Régis B Andriolo; Cathy Bennett; Suzana A S Lustosa; Delcio Matos; Daniel R Waisberg; Jaques Waisberg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-22

5.  Albumin level and patient age predict outcomes in patients referred for gastrostomy insertion: internal and external validation of a gastrostomy score and comparison with artificial neural networks.

Authors:  John Leeds; Mark E McAlindon; Julia Grant; Helen E Robson; Stephen R Morley; Gary James; Barbara Hoeroldt; Kapil Kapur; Keith Dear; James Hensman; Keith Worden; David S Sanders
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards PEG tube feeding in advanced dementia: time to engage with a wide clinical audience?

Authors:  Sebastian Adu-Tei; Hugo A Penny; Mansour El-Fekhi; Charlotte Ruse; David S Sanders
Journal:  Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol       Date:  2019-09

Review 7.  Enteral tube feeding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.

Authors:  Hans Dieter Katzberg; Michael Benatar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-01-19

8.  People with enteral tubes and their carers' views of living with a tube and managing associated problems: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Sue M Green; Kay Townsend; Nikki Jarrett; Catherine Westoby; Mandy Fader
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2019-07-14       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 9.  Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Sampson; Bridget Candy; Louise Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique.

Authors:  M W Gauderer; J L Ponsky; R J Izant
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.