Literature DB >> 10894581

Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia.

D S Sanders1, M J Carter, J D'Silva, G James, R P Bolton, K D Bardhan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding has been validated in specific clinical situations such as acute stroke with dysphagia and oropharyngeal malignancy. The perception that gastrostomy insertion is safe and technically simple has led to an increase in the demands for PEG insertion, encompassing clinical applications such as in patients with dementia, in whom its role has not been justified. The purpose of this study was to compare the mortality of patients with dementia who were fed by PEG to that of other subgroups of patients requiring gastrostomy feeding.
METHODS: The study focused on a cohort of 361 consecutive patients requiring PEG feeding between August 1992 and July 1997 from two District General Hospitals (Rotherham District General Hospital and Doncaster Royal Infirmary) in South Yorkshire. A retrospective cohort survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method and Cox proportional hazards analysis.
RESULTS: In all patients requiring gastrostomy feeding there is a high initial mortality of 28% at 30 days. However, patients with dementia have a worse prognosis compared to other subgroups, with 54% having died at 1 month and 90% at 1 yr (log rank test p < 0.0001). This difference remained significant (log rank p < 0.0001) after adjusting for age at the time of PEG insertion.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration in the United Kingdom that the mortality of patients with dementia who are fed by gastrostomy is considerable. Consequently, we may wish to advise against gastrostomy feeding in selected patients within this clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10894581     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02079.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  39 in total

1.  Artificially giving nutrition and fluids is not one action.

Authors:  Thomas Finucane; Colleen Christmas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-29

2.  Swallowing and dementia--practical solutions for a highly emotive problem?

Authors:  Matthew Kurien; David S Sanders
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  Feeding tubes in dementia: is there an effective UK strategy?

Authors:  D S Sanders; Karna D Bardhan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-16

4.  Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  M Ljungdahl; M Sundbom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  [PEG tube placement in German geriatric wards - a retrospective data-base analysis].

Authors:  R Wirth; D Volkert; J M Bauer; R J Schulz; M Borchelt; C Fleischhauer; E Steinhagen-Thiessen; C C Sieber
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 6.  Artificial nutrition and hydration: the evolution of ethics, evidence, and policy.

Authors:  Howard Brody; Laura D Hermer; Larry D Scott; L Lee Grumbles; Julie E Kutac; Susan D McCammon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Cui bono? PEG feeding.

Authors:  Heather Parr; David S Sanders
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.659

8.  Trends in the use of feeding tubes in North Carolina hospitals.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Christopher E Cox; Joanne M Garrett; Laura Hanson; George M Holmes; Ann Howard; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Ethics and gastrointestinal artificial feeding.

Authors:  Timothy O Lipman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-08

Review 10.  Complications of and controversies associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: report of a case and literature review.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Potack; Sita Chokhavatia
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.