Literature DB >> 22032317

Albumin level and patient age predict outcomes in patients referred for gastrostomy insertion: internal and external validation of a gastrostomy score and comparison with artificial neural networks.

John Leeds1, Mark E McAlindon, Julia Grant, Helen E Robson, Stephen R Morley, Gary James, Barbara Hoeroldt, Kapil Kapur, Keith Dear, James Hensman, Keith Worden, David S Sanders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Significant mortality after gastrostomy insertion remains and some risk factors have been identified, but no predictive scoring system exists.
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for mortality, formulate a predictive scoring system, and validate the score. Comparison to an artificial neural network (ANN).
DESIGN: Endoscopic database analysis.
SETTING: Six hospitals (2 teaching hospitals) in the South Yorkshire region, United Kingdom. PATIENTS: This study involved all patients referred for gastrostomy insertion. INTERVENTION: Generation of clinical scores to predict 30-day mortality in patients undergoing gastrostomy insertion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Risk factors for 30-day mortality. Internal and external validation of the score. Comparison with an ANN.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that 30-day mortality was associated with age, albumin levels, and cardiac and neurological comorbidities. Multivariate analysis showed that only age and albumin levels were independent. Modeling provided scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 corresponding to 30-day mortalities of 0% (0-2.1), 7% (2.9-13.9), 21.3% (13.5-30.9), and 37.3% (24.1-51.9), respectively. Application of the scoring system at the other teaching hospital and the 4 district general hospitals gave 30-day mortality rates that were not significantly different from those predicted. Receiver operating characteristic curves for the score and the ANN were comparable. LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized study. Score not used as a decision-making tool.
CONCLUSION: The gastrostomy score provides an estimate of 30-day mortality for patients (and their relatives) when gastrostomy insertion is being discussed. This score requires evaluation as a decision-making tool in clinical practice. ANN analysis results were similar to the outcomes from the clinical score.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22032317     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  4 in total

1.  Cui bono? PEG feeding.

Authors:  Heather Parr; David S Sanders
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 2.  The future developments in nutrition.

Authors:  C F Donnellan; S Lal
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-31

3.  Factors Associated with 30-Day Mortality in Patients after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy.

Authors:  Diego L Lima; Luiz Eduardo C Miranda; Marcel Rolland Ciro da Penha; Raquel N C L Lima; Dalmir Cavalcanti Dos Santos; Matheus Stillner Eufrânio; Ana Clara G Miranda; Leila Maria Moreira Beltrão Pereira
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Predictive factors for early mortality after percutaneous endoscopic and radiologically-inserted gastrostomy.

Authors:  Faidon-Marios Laskaratos; Martin Walker; Mary Walker; Janitha Gowribalan; Despoina Gkotsi; Victoria Wojciechowska; Ajay Arora; Anthony Jenkins
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.