Literature DB >> 33475448

Attention Biases Competition for Visual Representation via Dissociable Influences from Frontal and Parietal Cortex.

Andrew D Sheldon1, Elyana Saad2, Muhammet I Sahan3, Emma E Meyering1, Michael J Starrett4, Joshua J LaRocque5, Nathan S Rose6, Bradley R Postle1.   

Abstract

What mechanisms underlie the prioritization of neural representations of visually perceived information to guide behavior? We assessed the dynamics whereby attention biases competition for representation of visual stimuli by enhancing representations of relevant information and suppressing the irrelevant. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) classifiers were trained to discriminate patterns of fMRI activity associated with each of three stimuli, within several predefined ROIs. Participants performed a change-detection task wherein two of three presented items flashed at 1 Hz, one to each side of central fixation. Both flashing stimuli would unpredictably change state, but participants covertly counted the number of changes only for the cued item. In the ventral occipito-temporal ROI, MVPA evidence (a proxy for representational fidelity) was dynamically enhanced for attended stimuli and suppressed for unattended stimuli, consistent with a mechanism of biased competition between stimulus representations. Frontal and parietal ROIs displayed a qualitatively distinct, more "source-like" profile, wherein MVPA evidence for only the attended stimulus could be observed above baseline levels. To assess how attentional modulation of ventral occipito-temporal representations might relate to signals originating in the frontal and/or parietal ROIs, we analyzed informational connectivity (IC), which indexes time-varying covariation between regional levels of MVPA evidence. Parietal-posterior IC was elevated during the task, but did not differ for cued versus uncued items. Frontal-posterior IC, in contrast, was sensitive to an item's priority status. Thus, although regions of frontal and parietal cortex act as sources of top-down attentional control, their precise functions likely differ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33475448      PMCID: PMC8354683          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.420


  38 in total

1.  Overlapping and distinct contributions of stimulus location and of spatial context to nonspatial visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Ying Cai; Andrew D Sheldon; Qing Yu; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Within-Category Decoding of Information in Different Attentional States in Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Joshua J LaRocque; Adam C Riggall; Stephen M Emrich; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Just above Chance: Is It Harder to Decode Information from Prefrontal Cortex Hemodynamic Activity Patterns?

Authors:  Apoorva Bhandari; Christopher Gagne; David Badre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Decoding the contents of visual short-term memory from human visual and parietal cortex.

Authors:  Thomas B Christophel; Martin N Hebart; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  High stakes trigger the use of multiple memories to enhance the control of attention.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Neural mechanisms of object-based attention.

Authors:  Daniel Baldauf; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Visual attention mitigates information loss in small- and large-scale neural codes.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sameer Saproo; John T Serences
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Sensory uncertainty decoded from visual cortex predicts behavior.

Authors:  Ruben S van Bergen; Wei Ji Ma; Michael S Pratte; Janneke F M Jehee
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Frontal and parietal cortical interactions with distributed visual representations during selective attention and action selection.

Authors:  Natalie Nelissen; Mark Stokes; Anna C Nobre; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The Flexible Nature of the Interaction Between Attention and Working Memory.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-08-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Neuroimaging and the localization of function in visual cognition.

Authors:  Bradley R Postle; Qing Yu
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-06-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.