Literature DB >> 23448876

High stakes trigger the use of multiple memories to enhance the control of attention.

Robert M G Reinhart1, Geoffrey F Woodman2.   

Abstract

We can more precisely tune attention to highly rewarding objects than other objects in our environment, but how our brains do this is unknown. After a few trials of searching for the same object, subjects' electrical brain activity indicated that they handed off the memory representations used to control attention from working memory to long-term memory. However, when a large reward was possible, the neural signature of working memory returned as subjects recruited working memory to supplement the cognitive control afforded by the representations accumulated in long-term memory. The amplitude of this neural signature of working memory predicted the magnitude of the subsequent behavioral reward-based attention effects across tasks and individuals, showing the ubiquity of this cognitive reaction to high-stakes situations.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  attention; event-related potentials; long-term memory; reward; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23448876      PMCID: PMC4089381          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  40 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-12

2.  Role for the membrane receptor guanylyl cyclase-C in attention deficiency and hyperactive behavior.

Authors:  Rong Gong; Cheng Ding; Ji Hu; Yao Lu; Fei Liu; Elizabeth Mann; Fuqiang Xu; Mitchell B Cohen; Minmin Luo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses.

Authors:  Chiara Della Libera; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05-05

4.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Optimal reward harvesting in complex perceptual environments.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Christof Koch; Antonio Rangel; Pietro Perona
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Ruth M Krebs; Carsten N Boehler; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-09-22

8.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.

Authors:  Claus Bundesen; Thomas Habekost; Soren Kyllingsbaek
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Modulations in oscillatory activity with amplitude asymmetry can produce cognitively relevant event-related responses.

Authors:  Hanneke van Dijk; Jurrian van der Werf; Ali Mazaheri; W Pieter Medendorp; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Eric Maris; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23
View more
  23 in total

1.  Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Attention's Accelerator.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Laura J McClenahan; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-04-07

3.  Enhancing long-term memory with stimulation tunes visual attention in one trial.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Theories of Working Memory: Differences in Definition, Degree of Modularity, Role of Attention, and Purpose.

Authors:  Eryn J Adams; Anh T Nguyen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Nancy B Carlisle; Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Localization and Elimination of Attentional Dysfunction in Schizophrenia During Visual Search.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Sohee Park; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Personality correlates of individual differences in the recruitment of cognitive mechanisms when rewards are at stake.

Authors:  Allan J Heritage; Laura J Long; Geoffrey F Woodman; David H Zald
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Neural bases of automaticity.

Authors:  Mathieu Servant; Peter Cassey; Geoffrey F Woodman; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Memory search for the first target modulates the magnitude of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Ashley Sherman; Sage E P Boettcher; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

Review 10.  The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Halely Balaban; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.