Literature DB >> 33468166

Determinants of using children's mental health research in policymaking: variation by type of research use and phase of policy process.

Jonathan Purtle1, Katherine L Nelson2, Sarah Mc Cue Horwitz3, Mary M McKay4, Kimberly E Hoagwood3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research use in policymaking is multi-faceted and has been the focus of extensive study. However, virtually no quantitative studies have examined whether the determinants of research use vary according to the type of research use or phase of policy process. Understanding such variation is important for selecting the targets of implementation strategies that aim to increase the frequency of research use in policymaking.
METHODS: A web-based survey of US state agency officials involved with children's mental health policymaking was conducted between December 2019 and February 2020 (n = 224, response rate = 33.7%, 49 states responding (98%), median respondents per state = 4). The dependent variables were composite scores of the frequency of using children's mental health research in general, specific types of research use (i.e., conceptual, instrumental, tactical, imposed), and during different phases of the policy process (i.e., agenda setting, policy development, policy implementation). The independent variables were four composite scores of determinants of research use: agency leadership for research use, agency barriers to research use, research use skills, and dissemination barriers (e.g., lack of actionable messages/recommendations in research summaries, lack of interaction/collaboration with researchers). Separate multiple linear regression models estimated associations between determinant and frequency of research use scores.
RESULTS: Determinants of research use varied significantly by type of research use and phase of policy process. For example, agency leadership for research use was the only determinant significantly associated with imposed research use (β = 0.31, p < 0.001). Skills for research use were the only determinant associated with tactical research use (β = 0.17, p = 0.03) and were only associated with research use in the agenda-setting phase (β = 0.16, p = 0.04). Dissemination barriers were the most universal determinants of research use, as they were significantly and inversely associated with frequency of conceptual (β = -0.21, p = 0.01) and instrumental (β = -0.22, p = 0.01) research use and during all three phases of policy process.
CONCLUSIONS: Decisions about the determinants to target with policy-focused implementation strategies-and the strategies that are selected to affect these targets-should reflect the specific types of research use that these strategies aim to influence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Mental health; Policy; Research use in policymaking; United States

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33468166      PMCID: PMC7815190          DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01081-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implement Sci        ISSN: 1748-5908            Impact factor:   7.327


  60 in total

1.  Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers.

Authors:  Abby S Haynes; James A Gillespie; Gemma E Derrick; Wayne D Hall; Sally Redman; Simon Chapman; Heidi Sturk
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Learning About and Using Research Evidence Among Public Health Practitioners.

Authors:  Rebekah R Jacob; Peg M Allen; Linda J Ahrendt; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Uses of Population Health Rankings in Local Policy Contexts: A Multisite Case Study.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Rachel Peters; Jennifer Kolker; Ana V Diez Roux
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Legislators' Sources of Behavioral Health Research and Preferences for Dissemination: Variations by Political Party.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Elizabeth A Dodson; Katherine Nelson; Zachary F Meisel; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Toward the data-driven dissemination of findings from psychological science.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Jacob S Marzalik; Raquel W Halfond; Lynn F Bufka; Bethany A Teachman; Gregory A Aarons
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2020-11

6.  Practical guidelines for educating policymakers: the family impact seminar as an approach to advancing the interests of children and families in the policy arena.

Authors:  Brian L Wilcox; P Victoria Weisz; Monica K Miller
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2005-12

7.  Development and validation of SEER (Seeking, Engaging with and Evaluating Research): a measure of policymakers' capacity to engage with and use research.

Authors:  Sue E Brennan; Joanne E McKenzie; Tari Turner; Sally Redman; Steve Makkar; Anna Williamson; Abby Haynes; Sally E Green
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-01-17

Review 8.  Organisational factors that facilitate research use in public health policy-making: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mette Winge Jakobsen; Leena Eklund Karlsson; Thomas Skovgaard; Arja R Aro
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2019-11-21

Review 9.  What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers' capacity to use research? A realist scoping review.

Authors:  Abby Haynes; Samantha J Rowbotham; Sally Redman; Sue Brennan; Anna Williamson; Gabriel Moore
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-04-10

10.  A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health.

Authors:  Cara C Lewis; Meredith R Boyd; Callie Walsh-Bailey; Aaron R Lyon; Rinad Beidas; Brian Mittman; Gregory A Aarons; Bryan J Weiner; David A Chambers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  6 in total

1.  Inter-agency collaboration is associated with increased frequency of research use in children's mental health policy making.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Katherine L Nelson; Rebecca Lengnick-Hall; Sarah Mc Cue Horwitz; Lawrence A Palinkas; Mary M McKay; Kimberly E Hoagwood
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.734

2.  Simulating the role of knowledge brokers in policy making in state agencies: An agent-based model.

Authors:  Todd Combs; Katherine L Nelson; Douglas Luke; F Hunter McGuire; Gracelyn Cruden; Rosie Mae Henson; Danielle R Adams; Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood; Jonathan Purtle
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 3.  Dissemination Science in School Mental Health: A Framework for Future Research.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Baker; Stephanie K Brewer; Julie Sarno Owens; Clayton R Cook; Aaron R Lyon
Journal:  School Ment Health       Date:  2021-04-18

4.  Translating Medicaid policy into practice: policy implementation strategies from three US states' experiences enhancing substance use disorder treatment.

Authors:  Erika L Crable; Allyn Benintendi; David K Jones; Alexander Y Walley; Jacqueline Milton Hicks; Mari-Lynn Drainoni
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  Leveraging academic initiatives to advance implementation practice: a scoping review of capacity building interventions.

Authors:  Lisa A Juckett; Alicia C Bunger; Molly M McNett; Monica L Robinson; Sharon J Tucker
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 7.960

6.  State Policies that Impact the Design of Children's Mental Health Services: A Modified Delphi Study.

Authors:  Katherine L Nelson; Byron J Powell; Brent Langellier; Félice Lê-Scherban; Paul Shattuck; Kimberly Hoagwood; Jonathan Purtle
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2022-06-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.