Rebekah R Jacob1, Peg M Allen2, Linda J Ahrendt3, Ross C Brownson4. 1. Nine Network of Public Media, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: rjacob@ketc.org. 2. Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri. 3. South Dakota Department of Health, Pierre, South Dakota. 4. Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Funders and accreditation standards increasingly call on state and local public health agencies to use the best available science. Using research evidence is a key process in practicing evidence-based decision making (EBDM). This study explored preferences for and uses of research evidence, and examined correlates regarding frequency of use. METHODS: In 2014, eligible staff from 12 state health departments and their partnering agencies were invited to complete an online self-report questionnaire and achieved an 82% response rate (1,237/1,509). The cross-sectional data analyzed in 2015 were baseline to a study on enhancing EBDM capacity and supports. RESULTS: Webinars/workshops was the most frequently selected method to learn public health findings among those in state and local health departments, whereas academic journals was the top selection by those in universities and healthcare facilities (p<0.001). Several modifiable EBDM practices were associated with more frequent use of research evidence, including direct supervisor expectations for EBDM use and performance evaluation based partially on EBDM use (AOR=2.5, 95% CI=1.9, 3.2 and AOR=2.5, 95% CI=2.1, 2.9, respectively). Increased numbers of EBDM practices were associated with higher odds of frequent research evidence use. Participant characteristics associated with higher research evidence use and adjusted for were job role, education attainment, and gender. CONCLUSIONS: To translate research into public health practice, researchers can tailor evidence on intervention implementation and effectiveness and disease burden to accessible and preferred formats for public health workers and partners. Management practices to support evidence-based disease prevention can be instituted and fostered in public health and partnering agencies.
INTRODUCTION: Funders and accreditation standards increasingly call on state and local public health agencies to use the best available science. Using research evidence is a key process in practicing evidence-based decision making (EBDM). This study explored preferences for and uses of research evidence, and examined correlates regarding frequency of use. METHODS: In 2014, eligible staff from 12 state health departments and their partnering agencies were invited to complete an online self-report questionnaire and achieved an 82% response rate (1,237/1,509). The cross-sectional data analyzed in 2015 were baseline to a study on enhancing EBDM capacity and supports. RESULTS: Webinars/workshops was the most frequently selected method to learn public health findings among those in state and local health departments, whereas academic journals was the top selection by those in universities and healthcare facilities (p<0.001). Several modifiable EBDM practices were associated with more frequent use of research evidence, including direct supervisor expectations for EBDM use and performance evaluation based partially on EBDM use (AOR=2.5, 95% CI=1.9, 3.2 and AOR=2.5, 95% CI=2.1, 2.9, respectively). Increased numbers of EBDM practices were associated with higher odds of frequent research evidence use. Participant characteristics associated with higher research evidence use and adjusted for were job role, education attainment, and gender. CONCLUSIONS: To translate research into public health practice, researchers can tailor evidence on intervention implementation and effectiveness and disease burden to accessible and preferred formats for public health workers and partners. Management practices to support evidence-based disease prevention can be instituted and fostered in public health and partnering agencies.
Authors: Nancy R LaPelle; Karen Dahlen; Barbara A Gabella; Ashley L Juhl; Elaine Martin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ross C Brownson; Rodrigo S Reis; Peg Allen; Kathleen Duggan; Robert Fields; Katherine A Stamatakis; Paul C Erwin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lois Orton; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; David Taylor-Robinson; Martin O'Flaherty; Simon Capewell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-07-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peg Allen; Sonia Sequeira; Rebekah R Jacob; Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino; Katherine A Stamatakis; Jenine K Harris; Lindsay Elliott; Jon F Kerner; Ellen Jones; Maureen Dobbins; Elizabeth A Baker; Ross C Brownson Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Elizabeth Neilson; Jennifer Villani; Shawna L Mercer; David L Tilley; Isaah Vincent; Anita Alston; Carrie N Klabunde Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: M Margaret Dolcini; Melissa A Davey-Rothwell; Ryan R Singh; Joseph A Catania; Alice A Gandelman; Vasudha Narayanan; Justin Harris; Virginia R McKay Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Margaret M Farrell; Kelsy M Gibson; Angela Marler; Leslie Given; Aubrey Van Kirk Villalobos; Candace Deaton Maynard; Frank S Bright; Ginny Thompson Kirklin; Truemenda C Green; Melanie Ruhe; Julia Thorsness; Stephanie Weiss Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Christopher E Knoepke; M Pilar Ingle; Daniel D Matlock; Ross C Brownson; Russell E Glasgow Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 3.240