Literature DB >> 22188348

Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers.

Abby S Haynes1, James A Gillespie, Gemma E Derrick, Wayne D Hall, Sally Redman, Simon Chapman, Heidi Sturk.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Public health researchers make a limited but important contribution to policy development. Some engage with policy directly through committees, advisory boards, advocacy coalitions, ministerial briefings, intervention design consultation, and research partnerships with government, as well as by championing research-informed policy in the media. Nevertheless, the research utilization literature has paid little attention to these diverse roles and the ways that policymakers use them. This article describes how policymakers use researchers in policymaking and examines how these activities relate to models of research utilization. It also explores the extent to which policymakers' accounts of using researchers concur with the experiences of "policy-engaged" public health researchers.
METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with thirty-two Australian civil servants, parliamentary ministers, and ministerial advisers identified as "research-engaged" by public health researchers. We used structured and inductive coding to generate categories that we then compared with some of the major research utilization models.
FINDINGS: Policymakers were sophisticated and multifaceted users of researchers for purposes that we describe as Galvanizing Ideas, Clarification and Advice, Persuasion, and Defense. These categories overlapped but did not wholly fit with research utilization models. Despite the negative connotation, "being used" was reported as reciprocal and uncompromising, although researchers and policymakers were likely to categorize these uses differently. Policymakers countered views expressed by some researchers. That is, they sought robust dialogue and creative thinking rather than compliance, and they valued expert opinion when research was insufficient for decision making. The technical/political character of policy development shaped the ways in which researchers were used.
CONCLUSIONS: Elucidating the diverse roles that public health researchers play in policymaking, and the multiple ways that policymakers use these roles, provides researchers and policymakers with a framework for negotiating and reflecting on activities that may advance the public health goals shared by both.
© 2011 Milbank Memorial Fund.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22188348      PMCID: PMC3250634          DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00643.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  21 in total

Review 1.  Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Innvaer; Gunn Vist; Mari Trommald; Andrew Oxman
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2002-10

2.  What is this knowledge that we seek to "exchange"?

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  History matters for understanding knowledge exchange.

Authors:  Daniel M Fox
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 4.  Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Damien Contandriopoulos; Marc Lemire; Jean-Louis Denis; Emile Tremblay
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies?

Authors:  Kathy Flitcroft; James Gillespie; Glenn Salkeld; Stacy Carter; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Research and advice giving: a functional view of evidence-informed policy advice in a Canadian Ministry of Health.

Authors:  Jonathan Lomas; Adalsteinn D Brown
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Research use in children's mental health policy in Canada: maintaining vigilance amid ambiguity.

Authors:  Charlotte Waddell; John N Lavis; Julia Abelson; Jonathan Lomas; Cody A Shepherd; Twylla Bird-Gayson; Mita Giacomini; David R Dan Offord
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Pathways to "evidence-informed" policy and practice: a framework for action.

Authors:  Shelley Bowen; Anthony B Zwi
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers.

Authors:  Danielle M Campbell; Sally Redman; Louisa Jorm; Margaret Cooke; Anthony B Zwi; Lucie Rychetnik
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2009-08-24

10.  The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment.

Authors:  Stephen R Hanney; Miguel A Gonzalez-Block; Martin J Buxton; Maurice Kogan
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2003-01-13
View more
  20 in total

1.  Criminalization of HIV transmission and exposure: research and policy agenda.

Authors:  Zita Lazzarini; Carol L Galletly; Eric Mykhalovskiy; Dini Harsono; Elaine O'Keefe; Merrill Singer; Robert J Levine
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Incorporating social dimensions in planning, managing and evaluating environmental projects.

Authors:  C Louise Goggin; Thomas Barrett; John Leys; Gregory Summerell; Emma Gorrod; Stuart Waters; Mark Littleboy; Tony D Auld; Michael J Drielsma; Brian R Jenkins
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Use of Research Evidence and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in Youth-Serving Systems.

Authors:  Lawrence A Palinkas; Lisa Saldana; Chih-Ping Chou; Patricia Chamberlain
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2017-11-06

4.  Evidence for informing health policy development in Low-income Countries (LICs): perspectives of policy actors in Uganda.

Authors:  Juliet Nabyonga-Orem; Rhona Mijumbi
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-03-08

5.  Identifying trustworthy experts: how do policymakers find and assess public health researchers worth consulting or collaborating with?

Authors:  Abby S Haynes; Gemma E Derrick; Sally Redman; Wayne D Hall; James A Gillespie; Simon Chapman; Heidi Sturk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.

Authors:  Kathryn Oliver; Simon Innvar; Theo Lorenc; Jenny Woodman; James Thomas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Liverani; Benjamin Hawkins; Justin O Parkhurst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predicting research use in a public health policy environment: results of a logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  Pauline Zardo; Alex Collie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Protocol for the process evaluation of a complex intervention designed to increase the use of research in health policy and program organisations (the SPIRIT study).

Authors:  Abby Haynes; Sue Brennan; Stacy Carter; Denise O'Connor; Carmen Huckel Schneider; Tari Turner; Gisselle Gallego
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 10.  Knowledge brokering for healthy aging: a scoping review of potential approaches.

Authors:  Dwayne Van Eerd; Kristine Newman; Ryan DeForge; Robin Urquhart; Evelyn Cornelissen; Katie N Dainty
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.