Literature DB >> 33467148

Effects of Positive Human Contact during Gestation on the Behaviour, Physiology and Reproductive Performance of Sows.

Megan E Hayes1, Lauren M Hemsworth1, Rebecca S Morrison2, Kym L Butler1,3, Maxine Rice1, Jean-Loup Rault4, Paul H Hemsworth1.   

Abstract

Previous positive interactions with humans may ameliorate the stress response of farm animals to aversive routine practices such as painful or stressful procedures, particularly those associated with stockpeople. We studied the effects of positive handling by providing younger (parity 1-2) and older (parity 3-8) sows housed in pens of fifteen (n = 24 pens in total) with either positive human contact (+HC) or routine human contact (control) during gestation. The +HC treatment involved a familiar stockperson patting and scratching sows and was imposed at a pen-level for 2 min daily. Measurements studied included behavioural, physiological and productivity variables. The +HC sows showed reduced avoidance of the stockperson conducting pregnancy testing and vaccination in the home pens, however the behavioural and cortisol responses of sows in a standard unfamiliar human approach test did not differ. There were no effects of +HC on aggression between sows, serum cortisol or serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations during gestation, or on the behavioural and cortisol response to being moved to farrowing crates. There were also no effects of +HC on the maternal responsiveness of sows, farrowing rate or the number of piglets born alive, stillborn or weaned. Sows in the +HC pens reduced their physical interaction with the stockpeople imposing the treatment after 2 weeks, which suggests the sows may have habituated to the novel or possible rewarding elements of the handling treatment. This experiment shows that regular positive interaction with stockpeople does reduce sows' fear of stockpeople, but does not always confer stress resilence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; handling; positive human contact; reproduction; sows; stress

Year:  2021        PMID: 33467148      PMCID: PMC7830568          DOI: 10.3390/ani11010214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  16 in total

1.  Positive and negative gestational handling influences placental traits and mother-offspring behavior in dairy goats.

Authors:  Emma M Baxter; Johan Mulligan; Sarah A Hall; Jo E Donbavand; Rupert Palme; Emad Aldujaili; Adroaldo J Zanella; Cathy M Dwyer
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-02-02

2.  Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered in combination.

Authors:  J N Marchant-Forde; D C Lay; K A McMunn; H W Cheng; E A Pajor; R M Marchant-Forde
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The influence of farmers' behavior on calves' reactions to transport and quality of veal meat.

Authors:  B J Lensink; X Fernandez; G Cozzi; L Florand; I Veissier
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  The perception of humans by piglets: recognition of familiar handlers and generalisation to unfamiliar humans.

Authors:  Sophie Brajon; Jean-Paul Laforest; Renée Bergeron; Céline Tallet; Nicolas Devillers
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  The behaviour and welfare of sows and piglets in farrowing crates or lactation pens.

Authors:  C Singh; M Verdon; G M Cronin; P H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Short Communication: effect of positive handling of sows on litter performance and pre-weaning piglet mortality.

Authors:  D De Meyer; A Amalraj; T Van Limbergen; M Fockedey; S Edwards; V A Moustsen; I Chantziaras; D Maes
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in serum as an animal welfare indicator of environmental enrichment in pigs.

Authors:  J-L Rault; A J Lawrence; C R Ralph
Journal:  Domest Anim Endocrinol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Housing and road transport modify the brain neurotransmitter systems of pigs: Do pigs raised in different conditions cope differently with unknown environments?

Authors:  Laura Arroyo; Daniel Valent; Ricard Carreras; Raquel Peña; Josefa Sabrià; Antonio Velarde; Anna Bassols
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Developmental cascades linking stress inoculation, arousal regulation, and resilience.

Authors:  David M Lyons; Karen J Parker; Maor Katz; Alan F Schatzberg
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Risk Factors for Chronic Stress in Sows Housed in Groups, and Associated Risks of Prenatal Stress in Their Offspring.

Authors:  Martyna Ewa Lagoda; Joanna Marchewka; Keelin O'Driscoll; Laura Ann Boyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-12

2.  Positive Human Contact and Housing Systems Impact the Responses of Piglets to Various Stressors.

Authors:  Megan E Hayes; Lauren M Hemsworth; Rebecca S Morrison; Alan J Tilbrook; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.