Literature DB >> 11263824

The influence of farmers' behavior on calves' reactions to transport and quality of veal meat.

B J Lensink1, X Fernandez, G Cozzi, L Florand, I Veissier.   

Abstract

The relationships between farmers' behavior toward veal calves, calves' responses to handling and transport, and veal meat quality were assessed. Two groups of 10 veal units were selected based on previous observed farmers' behavior toward the calves: one group consisted of farmers who had shown predominantly "positive" behavior toward the calves, and the other group of farmers had shown predominantly "negative" behavior. Calves were observed for their reactions to people at the unit, and 20 calves per veal unit were transported either directly to the slaughterhouse or subjected to additional transport consisting of a supplementary 20-min transport with additional unloading and loading. The effort needed to load the calves onto the truck and their behavior during loading was observed. During loading and unloading, and during lairage at the slaughterhouse, potentially traumatic incidents (falling down, hits against structures, slips) were recorded, and heart rate and cortisol measurements were taken. Carcasses were evaluated on their weight, color, conformation, pH, and bruise level. A meat sample was taken from the longissimus thoracis muscle for physical, chemical, and sensory analysis. Calves originating from "positive behavior" units showed fewer fear responses to people at the veal unit, needed less effort to be loaded to the truck, had lower heart rates during loading and unloading, and had fewer incidents at the slaughterhouse than calves from "negative behavior" units (P < 0.05). Carcasses from calves from "positive behavior" units were paler, and analyses of the meat sample revealed lower pH, moisture level, and redness compared to carcasses from calves from "negative behavior" units (P < 0.05). Additional transport led to a lower cortisol level after transport and to higher carcass pH values at slaughter compared to direct transport (P < 0.05) but did not affect meat quality. We concluded that farmers' positive behavior toward veal calves during rearing is likely to reduce the emotional responses of calves to handling and transport and to lead to fewer incidents, compared to negative behavior. This reduction of calves' emotional responses seems to be the reason for improved veal meat color.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11263824     DOI: 10.2527/2001.793642x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

1.  Welfare of cattle during transport.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Bernadette Earley; Sandra Edwards; Luigi Faucitano; Sonia Marti; Genaro C Miranda de La Lama; Leonardo Nanni Costa; Peter T Thomsen; Sean Ashe; Lina Mur; Yves Van der Stede; Mette Herskin
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

2.  The Relationship between Farmers' Perceptions and Animal Welfare Standards in Sheep Farms.

Authors:  I Kılıç; Z Bozkurt
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Quality Assessment of Longissimus and Semitendinosus Muscles from Beef Cattle Subjected to Non-penetrative and Penetrative Percussive Stunning Methods.

Authors:  A Q Sazili; B Norbaiyah; I Zulkifli; Y M Goh; M Lotfi; A H Small
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Owner personality and the wellbeing of their cats share parallels with the parent-child relationship.

Authors:  Lauren R Finka; Joanna Ward; Mark J Farnworth; Daniel S Mills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related with the risks of poor welfare in intensive calf farming systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2006-06-06

6.  Effects of Positive Human Contact during Gestation on the Behaviour, Physiology and Reproductive Performance of Sows.

Authors:  Megan E Hayes; Lauren M Hemsworth; Rebecca S Morrison; Kym L Butler; Maxine Rice; Jean-Loup Rault; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Meat Value Chain Losses in Iran.

Authors:  Vahid Ranaei; Zahra Pilevar; Changiz Esfandiari; Amin Mousavi Khaneghah; Rajan Dhakal; Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez; Hedayat Hosseini
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 8.  Researching Human-Cattle Interaction on Rangelands: Challenges and Potential Solutions.

Authors:  Maggie Creamer; Kristina Horback
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The Welfare of Cattle, Sheep, Goats and Pigs from the Perspective of Traumatic Injuries Detected at Slaughterhouse Postmortem Inspection.

Authors:  Lenka Valkova; Vladimir Vecerek; Eva Voslarova; Michal Kaluza; Daniela Takacova
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Determination of plasmatic cortisol for evaluation of animal welfare during slaughter.

Authors:  Edmondo Ceci; Patrizia Marchetti; Giorgio Samoilis; Stefano Sportelli; Rocco Roma; Roberta Barrasso; Giuseppina Tantillo; Giancarlo Bozzo
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2017-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.