Literature DB >> 26187347

The perception of humans by piglets: recognition of familiar handlers and generalisation to unfamiliar humans.

Sophie Brajon1,2, Jean-Paul Laforest2, Renée Bergeron3, Céline Tallet4,5, Nicolas Devillers6.   

Abstract

Humans are part of the environment of domestic animals and interact with them daily, providing a good basis for the study of interspecific relationships. Abilities to discriminate and recognise individuals form the basis of these relationships, and they are crucial skills for domestic animals, since individual humans can differ in their behaviour towards them. At the same time, with experience, animals may develop a general memory of humans and generalise their behaviour towards strangers. This study aimed to determine the extent to which weaned piglets can discriminate familiar humans and generalise their past experience when faced with unfamiliar humans. Forty-eight groups of three piglets were submitted to two consecutive 5-day conditioning periods of the same or opposite valence (positive and/or negative) given by one (A) or two (A then B) handlers. The reactivity of piglets to a motionless human and to an approaching human was measured before and after conditioning periods with unfamiliar and familiar handlers. Thereafter, piglets which received treatments with the two handlers A and B were subjected to a choice test between both handlers. The reactivity to an approaching human appeared to better reflect the past experience with familiar handlers since piglets clearly recognised them and adapted their behaviour accordingly. In contrast, reaction of piglets to a motionless human reflected their natural propensity to seek interaction, even after a negative experience. Although piglets were able to extend their memory of humans to an unfamiliar human through generalisation, many factors seemed to interact in this process, especially the complexity of the previous experience (inconsistent vs consistent) and the context in which piglets met the unfamiliar human (motionless vs approaching). We conclude that discrimination and generalisation processes of reactivity to humans do not simply rely on past interactions, but also depend on the context according to the degree of similitude with their past experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Context-dependent reaction; Discrimination; Generalisation; Human–animal relationship; Memory of humans; Pig; Sus scrofa

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26187347     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0900-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  7 in total

1.  Individual recognition and long-term memory of inanimate interactive agents and humans in dogs.

Authors:  Judit Abdai; Dalma Bartus; Sylvain Kraus; Zsuzsanna Gedai; Beatrix Laczi; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  Farm Animal Cognition-Linking Behavior, Welfare and Ethics.

Authors:  Christian Nawroth; Jan Langbein; Marjorie Coulon; Vivian Gabor; Susann Oesterwind; Judith Benz-Schwarzburg; Eberhard von Borell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-02-12

3.  Evidence of Pain, Stress, and Fear of Humans During Tail Docking and the Next Four Weeks in Piglets (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Céline Tallet; Marine Rakotomahandry; Sabine Herlemont; Armelle Prunier
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-12-11

4.  Effects of Positive Human Contact during Gestation on the Behaviour, Physiology and Reproductive Performance of Sows.

Authors:  Megan E Hayes; Lauren M Hemsworth; Rebecca S Morrison; Kym L Butler; Maxine Rice; Jean-Loup Rault; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Human proximity seeking in family pigs and dogs.

Authors:  Paula Pérez Fraga; Linda Gerencsér; Attila Andics
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Way Humans Behave Modulates the Emotional State of Piglets.

Authors:  Sophie Brajon; Jean-Paul Laforest; Océane Schmitt; Nicolas Devillers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Examining affective structure in chickens: valence, intensity, persistence and generalization measured using a Conditioned Place Preference Test.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Paul; Joanne L Edgar; Gina Caplen; Christine J Nicol
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.448

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.