Literature DB >> 33458358

Machine learning applications in radiation oncology: Current use and needs to support clinical implementation.

Charlotte L Brouwer1, Anna M Dinkla2, Liesbeth Vandewinckele3,4, Wouter Crijns3,4, Michaël Claessens5,6, Dirk Verellen5,6, Wouter van Elmpt7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The use of artificial intelligence (AI)/ machine learning (ML) applications in radiation oncology is emerging, however no clear guidelines on commissioning of ML-based applications exist. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate the current use and needs to support implementation of ML-based applications in routine clinical practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted among medical physicists in radiation oncology, consisting of four parts: clinical applications (1), model training, acceptance and commissioning (2), quality assurance (QA) in clinical practice and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (3), and need for education and guidelines (4). Survey answers of medical physicists of the same radiation oncology centre were treated as a separate unique responder in case reporting on different AI applications.
RESULTS: In total, 213 medical physicists from 202 radiation oncology centres were included in the analysis. Sixty-nine percent (1 4 7) was using (37%) or preparing (32%) to use ML in clinic, mostly for contouring and treatment planning. In 86%, human observers were still involved in daily clinical use for quality check of the output of the ML algorithm. Knowledge on ethics, legislation and data sharing was limited and scattered among responders. Besides the need for (implementation) guidelines, training of medical physicists and larger databases containing multicentre data was found to be the top priority to accommodate the further introduction of ML in clinical practice.
CONCLUSION: The results of this survey indicated the need for education and guidelines on the implementation and quality assurance of ML-based applications to benefit clinical introduction.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Clinical implementation; Commissioning; Machine learning; Quality assurance; Radiotherapy; Survey

Year:  2020        PMID: 33458358      PMCID: PMC7807598          DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 2405-6316


  13 in total

Review 1.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  B Fraass; K Doppke; M Hunt; G Kutcher; G Starkschall; R Stern; J Van Dyke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiotherapy equipment and departments in the European countries: final results from the ESTRO-HERO survey.

Authors:  Cai Grau; Noémie Defourny; Julian Malicki; Peter Dunscombe; Josep M Borras; Mary Coffey; Ben Slotman; Marta Bogusz; Chiara Gasparotto; Yolande Lievens; Arianit Kokobobo; Felix Sedlmayer; Elena Slobina; Karen Feyen; Tatiana Hadjieva; Karel Odrazka; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Jana Jaal; Ritva Bly; Bruno Chauvet; Normann Willich; Csaba Polgar; Jakob Johannsson; Moya Cunningham; Stefano Magrini; Vydmantas Atkocius; Michel Untereiner; Martin Pirotta; Vanja Karadjinovic; Sverre Levernes; Krystol Sladowski; Maria Lurdes Trigo; Barbara Šegedin; Aurora Rodriguez; Magnus Lagerlund; Bert Pastoors; Peter Hoskin; Jaap Vaarkamp; Ramon Cleries Soler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management.

Authors:  M Saiful Huq; Benedick A Fraass; Peter B Dunscombe; John P Gibbons; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Arno J Mundt; Sasa Mutic; Jatinder R Palta; Frank Rath; Bruce R Thomadsen; Jeffrey F Williamson; Ellen D Yorke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Grand challenges for medical physics in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Claudio Fiorino; Robert Jeraj; Catharine H Clark; Cristina Garibaldi; Dietmar Georg; Ludvig Muren; Wouter van Elmpt; Thomas Bortfeld; Nuria Jornet
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 5.  Overview of artificial intelligence-based applications in radiotherapy: Recommendations for implementation and quality assurance.

Authors:  Liesbeth Vandewinckele; Michaël Claessens; Anna Dinkla; Charlotte Brouwer; Wouter Crijns; Dirk Verellen; Wouter van Elmpt
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  The Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Radiation Therapy: Considerations for Future Curriculum Enhancement.

Authors:  Crispen Chamunyonga; Christopher Edwards; Peter Caldwell; Peta Rutledge; Julie Burbery
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-02-27

7.  Comparison of Planning Quality and Efficiency Between Conventional and Knowledge-based Algorithms in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Amy T Y Chang; Albert W M Hung; Fion W K Cheung; Michael C H Lee; Oscar S H Chan; Helen Philips; Yung-Tang Cheng; Wai-Tong Ng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Machine learning and modeling: Data, validation, communication challenges.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Dan Ruan; Gilmer Valdes; Andre Dekker; Todd McNutt; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Thor; Wade Smith; Arvind Rao; Clifton Fuller; Ying Xiao; Frank Manion; Matthew Schipper; Charles Mayo; Jean M Moran; Randall Ten Haken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine.

Authors:  Jianxing He; Sally L Baxter; Jie Xu; Jiming Xu; Xingtao Zhou; Kang Zhang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology: Opportunities, Requirements, and Needs.

Authors:  Mary Feng; Gilmer Valdes; Nayha Dixit; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  9 in total

1.  Deep learning-based classification and structure name standardization for organ at risk and target delineations in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christian Jamtheim Gustafsson; Michael Lempart; Johan Swärd; Emilia Persson; Tufve Nyholm; Camilla Thellenberg Karlsson; Jonas Scherman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Deep learning auto-segmentation and automated treatment planning for trismus risk reduction in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Maria Thor; Aditi Iyer; Jue Jiang; Aditya Apte; Harini Veeraraghavan; Natasha B Allgood; Jennifer A Kouri; Ying Zhou; Eve LoCastro; Sharif Elguindi; Linda Hong; Margie Hunt; Laura Cerviño; Michalis Aristophanous; Masoud Zarepisheh; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-28

3.  Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center.

Authors:  Andrea D'Aviero; Alessia Re; Francesco Catucci; Danila Piccari; Claudio Votta; Domenico Piro; Antonio Piras; Carmela Di Dio; Martina Iezzi; Francesco Preziosi; Sebastiano Menna; Flaviovincenzo Quaranta; Althea Boschetti; Marco Marras; Francesco Miccichè; Roberto Gallus; Luca Indovina; Francesco Bussu; Vincenzo Valentini; Davide Cusumano; Gian Carlo Mattiucci
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Evaluation of auto-segmentation for EBRT planning structures using deep learning-based workflow on cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jiahao Wang; Yuanyuan Chen; Hongling Xie; Lumeng Luo; Qiu Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Strategies for tackling the class imbalance problem of oropharyngeal primary tumor segmentation on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Roque Rodríguez Outeiral; Paula Bos; Hedda J van der Hulst; Abrahim Al-Mamgani; Bas Jasperse; Rita Simões; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-08-13

6.  Errors detected during physics plan review for external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Frank-André Siebert; Markus Hirt; Marc Delaperrière; Jürgen Dunst
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-09-17

Review 7.  Machine learning applications in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Matthew Field; Nicholas Hardcastle; Michael Jameson; Noel Aherne; Lois Holloway
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-24

8.  Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers.

Authors:  Jordan Wong; Vicky Huang; Derek Wells; Joshua Giambattista; Jonathan Giambattista; Carter Kolbeck; Karl Otto; Elantholi P Saibishkumar; Abraham Alexander
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Training and Validation of Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation Models for Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Using Retrospective Radiotherapy Planning Contours.

Authors:  Jordan Wong; Vicky Huang; Joshua A Giambattista; Tony Teke; Carter Kolbeck; Jonathan Giambattista; Siavash Atrchian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.