Literature DB >> 33447238

Does Internal Mammary Node Irradiation for Breast Cancer Make a Significant Difference to the Diameter of the Internal Mammary Artery? Correlation with Computed Tomography.

Gamze Durhan1, Ahmet Gürkan Erdemir1, Sezin Yuce Sari2, Melis Gultekin2, Jale Karakaya3, Meltem Gülsün Akpınar1, Gökhan Özyiğit2, Ferah Yildiz2, Figen Demirkazık1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lymphatic irradiation in breast cancer improves locoregional control and has been shown to decrease distant metastasis. However, irradiation also accelerates the formation of atherosclerosis and can cause stenosis, not only in the coronary arteries but also in the internal mammary artery (IMA). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of radiation on IMAs via computed tomography (CT).
METHODS: We reviewed the data of 3,612 patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) between January 2010 and December 2016. We included 239 patients with appropriate imaging and nodal irradiation in the study. All patients were treated with lymphatic irradiation of 46-50 Gy, and a boost dose (6-10 Gy) to the involved internal mammary nodes (IMNs) when imaging studies demonstrated pathological enlargement. Bilateral IMA diameter and the presence of calcification were assessed via thin contrast-enhanced CT and those of ipsilateral irradiated IMAs were compared with those of contralateral nonirradiated IMAs.
RESULTS: The mean diameter of irradiated IMAs was significantly shorter than that of nonirradiated IMAs, regardless of laterality. All vascular calcifications were determined on the irradiated side. A boost dose of radiation to the IMNs and radiation technique did not significantly affect the IMA diameter or the presence of calcification.
CONCLUSIONS: The diameter of the IMA is decreased due to RT regardless of laterality, radiation technique, and administration of a boost dose. Evaluation of vessels on CT before coronary artery bypass graft or flap reconstruction can help the surgeon select the most appropriate vessel.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Internal mammary artery; Radiation therapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33447238      PMCID: PMC7768163          DOI: 10.1159/000508244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  31 in total

Review 1.  The internal mammary artery and vein as recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Maurice Nahabedian
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 2.  Choice of recipient vessels in delayed TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Claire L F Temple; Eric A Strom; Adel Youssef; Howard N Langstein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Microvascular lifeboats: a stepwise approach to intraoperative venous congestion in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Charles Galanis; Phuong Nguyen; Justin Koh; Jason Roostaeian; Jaco Festekjian; Christopher Crisera
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Recipient vessels in free-flap breast reconstruction: a study of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels.

Authors:  L J Feng
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Radiation-Induced Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Deepa Raghunathan; Misha Iftikhar Khilji; Saamir A Hassan; Syed Wamique Yusuf
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.

Authors:  Andrea L Pusic; Evan Matros; Neil Fine; Edward Buchel; Gayle M Gordillo; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Ji Qi; Claudia Albornoz; Anne F Klassen; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Predictors of internal mammary vessel diameter: A computed tomographic angiography-assisted anatomic analysis.

Authors:  Julia A Cook; Sunil S Tholpady; Arash Momeni; Michael W Chu
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Screening for coronary artery disease after mediastinal irradiation for Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  Paul A Heidenreich; Ingela Schnittger; H William Strauss; Randall H Vagelos; Byron K Lee; Carol S Mariscal; David J Tate; Sandra J Horning; Richard T Hoppe; Steven L Hancock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Conduit choice for coronary artery bypass grafting after mediastinal radiation.

Authors:  Morgan L Brown; Hartzell V Schaff; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 10.  Radiation-related heart disease: current knowledge and future prospects.

Authors:  Sarah C Darby; David J Cutter; Marjan Boerma; Louis S Constine; Luis F Fajardo; Kazunori Kodama; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Lawrence B Marks; Fred A Mettler; Lori J Pierce; Klaus R Trott; Edward T H Yeh; Roy E Shore
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Contralateral internal mammary vessels - a rescue recipient vessels option in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Artur Nixon Martins; João Nunes Pombo; Catarina Paias Gouveia; Bruno Gomes Rosa; Gaizka Ribeiro; Carlos Pinheiro
Journal:  Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2022-03-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.