Literature DB >> 9030148

Recipient vessels in free-flap breast reconstruction: a study of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels.

L J Feng1.   

Abstract

The internal mammary vessels as recipient site for free flaps in breast reconstruction were investigated in this paper because of their ideal location for breast reconstruction. Comparisons were made with the thoracodorsal vessels in terms of external vessel diameter, vessel size discrepancy, flap loss and reexploration rates, and ease of flap placement. Eighty-one patients underwent 110 breast free-flap reconstructions (92 TRAM flaps and 18 superior gluteal flaps) between 1988 and 1994. Vessel size measurements were available on 75 flaps. The internal mammary artery diameter (2.36 +/- 0.50 mm, n = 51) was significantly larger than the thoracodorsal artery diameter (1.79 +/- 0.34 mm, n = 23; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the diameters of the internal mammary vein 2.6 +/- 0.58 mm, n = 52) and thoracodorsal vein (2.51 +/- 0.50 mm, n = 23; p = 0.93). The right internal mammary artery (2.52 +/- 0.51 mm) was significantly larger than the left internal mammary artery (2.30 +/- 0.55 mm; p = 0.046). The right internal mammary vein (2.89 +/- 0.56 mm) also was significantly larger than the left internal mammary vein (2.31 +/- 0.48 mm; p = 0.002). In terms of vessel size discrepancy, the internal mammary recipient artery tended to be greater in size than the TRAM flap donor artery (p = 0.003), while the thoracodorsal recipient artery tended to be smaller than the TRAM flap donor artery (p = 0.002). Flap failures and flap reexplorations occurred in the group using the thoracodorsal vessels but not in the internal mammary group. Correct flap placement using the internal mammary recipient site was achieved more easily for both unilateral and bilateral reconstructions because of the avoidance of lateral fullness and medial deficiency problems. The internal mammary recipient site is an important and at times superior alternative to the axillary recipient site because of its larger artery, especially when the axilla is scarred. For smaller free flaps such as a hemi-TRAM flap, as in bilateral TRAM flap reconstructions, the internal mammary site is invaluable because this recipient site allows exact placement of a smaller flap in the breast area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9030148     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199702000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  13 in total

1.  Breast reconstruction in private practice.

Authors:  Steven M Pisano; Peter R Ledoux; Chet L Nastala
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Advances in microvascular free tissue transfer.

Authors:  A A Kaidi; R A Hardesty
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-08

3.  The originating pattern of deep inferior epigastric artery: anatomical study and surgical considerations.

Authors:  Yujin Myung; Bomi Choi; Sang Jun Yim; Bo La Yun; Heeyeon Kwon; Chang Sik Pak; Chanyeong Heo; Jae Hoon Jeong
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  The anatomy and variations of the internal thoracic (internal mammary) artery and implications in autologous breast reconstruction: clinical anatomical study and literature review.

Authors:  Alice C A Murray; Warren M Rozen; Alberto Alonso-Burgos; Mark W Ashton; Emilio Garcia-Tutor; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  History of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Theodore W Uroskie; Lawrence B Colen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Rerouting the internal thoracic pedicle: a novel solution for maxillofacial reconstruction in vessel-depleted situations? A preliminary anatomic study.

Authors:  François Morel; Frédéric Crampon; Jérôme Adnot; Pierre-Yves Litzler; Fabrice Duparc; Olivier Trost
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  The cardiac implications of breast reconstruction using the internal mammary artery as the recipient vessel.

Authors:  Amanda J Fortin; H Brian Evans; Michael Wa Chu
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

8.  Does Internal Mammary Node Irradiation for Breast Cancer Make a Significant Difference to the Diameter of the Internal Mammary Artery? Correlation with Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Gamze Durhan; Ahmet Gürkan Erdemir; Sezin Yuce Sari; Melis Gultekin; Jale Karakaya; Meltem Gülsün Akpınar; Gökhan Özyiğit; Ferah Yildiz; Figen Demirkazık
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Bilateral analysis of the cross-sectional area of the internal mammary arteries and veins in patients with and without breast cancer on breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Robert-Jan Schipper; Marc B I Lobbes; Rieky E Dikmans; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Marjolein L Smidt; Carla Boetes
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-01-16

10.  Anatomic Evaluation of the Internal Mammary Vessels Using Multidetector CT Angiography Images in 100 Asian Patients.

Authors:  Hiroki Tashima; Masakazu Fujikawa; Ken Izumi; Ken Matsuda; Koichi Tomita; Ko Hosokawa
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.