Literature DB >> 19026798

Conduit choice for coronary artery bypass grafting after mediastinal radiation.

Morgan L Brown1, Hartzell V Schaff, Thoralf M Sundt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients who have undergone prior mediastinal radiation might require coronary artery bypass grafting. However, there is some concern regarding potential radiation damage to the internal thoracic artery. Our objective was to assess the late patency of the internal thoracic artery and venous grafts in patients with prior mediastinal radiation.
METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at our clinic after prior mediastinal radiation were identified, and medical records, including operative reports, clinical notes, and coronary angiography, were reviewed.
RESULTS: Between 1985 and 2005, 138 patients had coronary artery bypass grafting after mediastinal radiation. Of these, 25 underwent clinically indicated postoperative angiography. The mean patient age was 56.1 +/- 13.8 years, and 24% were female. All patients received between 3000 and 6000 rads in fractionated doses. Seventy-two percent of patients had 3-vessel coronary artery disease. At late angiography (mean, 2.2 years), 6 (32%) of 19 internal thoracic arteries and 13 (27%) of 48 venous or radial arterial conduits showed stenosis of 70% or greater (P = .72). Assessing only grafts that were anastomosed to the left anterior descending coronary artery, 35% (6 of 17) of internal thoracic artery grafts and 60% (3 of 5) of non-internal thoracic artery grafts showed narrowing of 70% or greater (P = .61). Among patients who received a graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery (n = 113), however, age-adjusted survival at 5 years was superior among those receiving an internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery.
CONCLUSIONS: Internal thoracic artery graft patency among patients with prior radiation was less than expected and similar to that for venous grafts, although the effect of conduit disease versus distal target vessel runoff is unknown. Despite this, late survival was superior among those receiving an internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery. These data support use of an internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery when it appears grossly to be an acceptable conduit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19026798     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  16 in total

1.  Severe left main coronary stenosis and mitral regurgitation in a young female patient without cardiovascular risk factors 14 years after mediastinal radiation therapy.

Authors:  Christian Templin; Jelena-Rima Ghadri; Christophe Wyss; Thomas F Lüscher; Philipp Kaufmann; Ulf Landmesser
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Radiation-Induced Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Deepa Raghunathan; Misha Iftikhar Khilji; Saamir A Hassan; Syed Wamique Yusuf
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Ischemic Heart Disease: Special Considerations in Cardio-Oncology.

Authors:  Dana Elena Giza; Fernando Boccalandro; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Gloria Iliescu; Kaveh Karimzad; Peter Kim; Cezar Iliescu
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-05

Review 4.  The anatomy and variations of the internal thoracic (internal mammary) artery and implications in autologous breast reconstruction: clinical anatomical study and literature review.

Authors:  Alice C A Murray; Warren M Rozen; Alberto Alonso-Burgos; Mark W Ashton; Emilio Garcia-Tutor; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Radiation-induced heart disease: an under-recognized entity?

Authors:  Margot Davis; Ronald M Witteles
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-06

Review 6.  Pregnancy Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Cardiovascular Considerations.

Authors:  Michael C Honigberg; Amy A Sarma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-06-19

7.  Radiation-induced cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Negareh Mousavi; Anju Nohria
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-10

Review 8.  How to prevent and manage radiation-induced coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jason R Cuomo; Sean P Javaheri; Gyanendra K Sharma; Deepak Kapoor; Adam E Berman; Neal L Weintraub
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Radiation-related heart disease: current knowledge and future prospects.

Authors:  Sarah C Darby; David J Cutter; Marjan Boerma; Louis S Constine; Luis F Fajardo; Kazunori Kodama; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Lawrence B Marks; Fred A Mettler; Lori J Pierce; Klaus R Trott; Edward T H Yeh; Roy E Shore
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Does Internal Mammary Node Irradiation for Breast Cancer Make a Significant Difference to the Diameter of the Internal Mammary Artery? Correlation with Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Gamze Durhan; Ahmet Gürkan Erdemir; Sezin Yuce Sari; Melis Gultekin; Jale Karakaya; Meltem Gülsün Akpınar; Gökhan Özyiğit; Ferah Yildiz; Figen Demirkazık
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.