Literature DB >> 15622239

Choice of recipient vessels in delayed TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.

Claire L F Temple1, Eric A Strom, Adel Youssef, Howard N Langstein.   

Abstract

This study compared the use of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal recipient vessels in a uniform group of patients who underwent delayed TRAM flap reconstruction after radiotherapy, focusing on usability rates and outcomes. The authors identified 123 delayed TRAM flap patients who had undergone postmastectomy radiotherapy from a prospective database (1990 to 2001). Recipient vessel unusability rates were calculated on the basis of reports of inspection of a vessel, either by direct intraoperative dissection or by findings from color Doppler examination (internal mammary vessels only). Charts were reviewed for outcomes including flap loss, vascular complications, fat necrosis, and lymphedema; t-test and chi-square analyses were performed to compare outcomes and unusability rates, and multiple regression analysis was performed to determine factors influencing outcome. Of the 123 planned free TRAM flaps, 106 were completed as free flaps and 17 were performed as pedicled flaps because of unusable recipient vessels. Of the free flaps, 45 were anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels, 55 to the thoracodorsal vessels, and six to other vessels. The internal mammary and thoracodorsal groups did not differ significantly in body mass index, abdominal scars, smoking history, time delay between irradiation and TRAM flap reconstruction, or flap ischemia time. Radiation doses to the axilla (thoracodorsal), internal mammary chain, and supraclavicular fossa were similar between the groups. The internal mammary vessels were rejected in 11 (20 percent) of 56 cases, and the thoracodorsal vessels were rejected in 19 (26 percent) of 74 cases (p = 0.42). In cases with unusable internal mammary vessels, 46 percent (n = 5) had inadequate veins, 27 percent (n = 3) had inadequate arteries, and in 27 percent (n = 3) both vessels were inadequate. In the 19 cases with unusable thoracodorsal vessels, 84 percent (n = 16) were excessively scarred, 11 percent (n = 2) had inadequate vessels, and 5 percent (n = 1) were absent. Outcomes were similar regardless of recipient vessels used (internal mammary versus thoracodorsal): total flap loss, 0 percent versus 4 percent (p = 0.20); vascular complications, 6.7 percent versus 11 percent (p = 0.46); arm lymphedema, 4.4 percent versus 9 percent (p = 0.37); partial flap loss, 9 percent versus 6 percent (p = 0.54); and fat necrosis, 18 percent versus 15 percent (p = 0.69). Multivariate analysis revealed a trend for higher complication rates in smokers and with the use of the thoracodorsal vessels as the recipients. Overall, no discernible unusability or outcome differences were detected between the internal mammary and thoracodorsal groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15622239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  18 in total

Review 1.  The anatomy and variations of the internal thoracic (internal mammary) artery and implications in autologous breast reconstruction: clinical anatomical study and literature review.

Authors:  Alice C A Murray; Warren M Rozen; Alberto Alonso-Burgos; Mark W Ashton; Emilio Garcia-Tutor; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: oncology, cosmesis and complications.

Authors:  Warren M Rozen; Mark W Ashton
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2012-08

3.  French Oak Wood (Quercus robur) Extract (Robuvit) in Primary Lymphedema: A Supplement, Pilot, Registry Evaluation.

Authors:  Gianni Belcaro; Mark Dugall; Shu Hu; Andrea Ledda; Edmondo Ippolito
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-03

4.  The extraperitoneal laparoscopic TRAM flap delay procedure: an alternative approach.

Authors:  Panduranga Yenumula; Erick F Rivas; Keith M Cavaness; Ed Kang; Edward Lanigan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy.

Authors:  Hr Teymouri; S Stergioula; M Eder; L Kovacs; E Biemer; Na Papadopulos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 6.  Achieving autologous breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Namrata S Anavekar; Warren M Rozen; Cara M Le Roux; Mark W Ashton
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Breast reconstruction and radiation therapy: A Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Oluwatola O Afolabi; Donald H Lalonde; Jason G Williams
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

8.  Internal mammary usability as recipient vessels in DIEP breast reconstruction in the setting of previous radiation.

Authors:  William Leppard; Thomas Pomposelli; Eric I Chang; Ahmed Suliman; Fernando Herrera
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 9.  Revisiting the internal mammaries as recipient vessels in breast reconstruction: considerations in current practice.

Authors:  Steven M Sultan; Amanda M Rizzo; Heather A Erhard; Teresa Benacquista; Katie E Weichman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Applications of rib sparing technique in internal mammary vessels exposure of abdominal free flap breast reconstructions: a 12-year single-center experience of 215 cases.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Qin Xiao; Rong Guo; Bingqiu Xiu; Lun Li; Weiru Chi; Yajia Gu; Jiong Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.