Literature DB >> 33444375

Impact of integrating objective structured clinical examination into academic student assessment: Large-scale experience in a French medical school.

Alexandre Matet1,2,3, Ludovic Fournel1,4,5, François Gaillard6, Laurence Amar1,7,8, Jean-Benoit Arlet1,9, Stéphanie Baron1,6, Anne-Sophie Bats1,10,11, Celine Buffel du Vaure12, Caroline Charlier1,13,14, Victoire De Lastours1,15,16, Albert Faye1,17, Eve Jablon18, Natacha Kadlub1,19, Julien Leguen1,20, David Lebeaux1,21, Alexandre Malmartel12, Tristan Mirault1,7,8, Benjamin Planquette1,22,23, Alexis Régent1,24,25, Jean-Laurent Thebault12, Alexy Tran Dinh1,26,27, Alexandre Nuzzo1,28, Guillaume Turc1,29,30, Gérard Friedlander1,6,31, Philippe Ruszniewski1,29,32, Cécile Badoual1,7,33, Brigitte Ranque1,7,9, Mehdi Oualha1,34,35, Marie Courbebaisse1,6,31.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) evaluate clinical reasoning, communication skills, and interpersonal behavior during medical education. In France, clinical training has long relied on bedside clinical practice in academic hospitals. The need for a simulated teaching environment has recently emerged, due to the increasing number of students admitted to medical schools, and the necessity of objectively evaluating practical skills. This study aimed at investigating the relationships between OSCE grades and current evaluation modalities.
METHODS: Three-hundred seventy-nine 4th-year students of University-of-Paris Medical School participated to the first large-scale OSCE at this institution, consisting in three OSCE stations (OSCE#1-3). OSCE#1 and #2 focused on cardiovascular clinical skills and competence, whereas OSCE#3 focused on relational skills while providing explanations before planned cholecystectomy. We investigated correlations of OSCE grades with multiple choice (MCQ)-based written examinations and evaluations of clinical skills and behavior (during hospital traineeships); OSCE grade distribution; and the impact of integrating OSCE grades into the current evaluation in terms of student ranking.
RESULTS: The competence-oriented OSCE#1 and OSCE#2 grades correlated only with MCQ grades (r = 0.19, P<0.001) or traineeship skill grades (r = 0.17, P = 0.001), respectively, and not with traineeship behavior grades (P>0.75). Conversely, the behavior-oriented OSCE#3 grades correlated with traineeship skill and behavior grades (r = 0.19, P<0.001, and r = 0.12, P = 0.032), but not with MCQ grades (P = 0.09). The dispersion of OSCE grades was wider than for MCQ examinations (P<0.001). When OSCE grades were integrated to the final fourth-year grade with an incremental 10%, 20% or 40% coefficient, an increasing proportion of the 379 students had a ranking variation by ±50 ranks (P<0.001). This ranking change mainly affected students among the mid-50% of ranking.
CONCLUSION: This large-scale French experience showed that OSCE designed to assess a combination of clinical competence and behavioral skills, increases the discriminatory capacity of current evaluations modalities in French medical schools.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33444375      PMCID: PMC7808634          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  30 in total

1.  Using the Judgments of Physician Examiners in Setting the Standards for a National Multi-center High Stakes OSCE.

Authors:  W. Dale Dauphinee; David E. Blackmore; Sydney Smee; Arthur I. Rothman; Richard Reznick
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.853

2.  Research in medical education: three decades of progress.

Authors:  Geoff Norman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-29

3.  Traditional finals and OSCEs in predicting consultant and self-reported clinical skills of PRHOs: a pilot study.

Authors:  Christopher S Probert; David J Cahill; Gemma L McCann; Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Relationship between dental students' performance on standardized multiple-choice examinations and OSCEs.

Authors:  Padraig C Dennehy; Srinivas M Susarla; Nadeem Y Karimbux
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) compared with traditional assessment methods.

Authors:  Stewart Brian Kirton; Laura Kravitz
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Medical students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement.

Authors:  Abdulrasheed A Nasir; Ayodeji S Yusuf; Lukman O Abdur-Rahman; Olasunkanmi M Babalola; Ademola A Adeyeye; Ademola A Popoola; James O Adeniran
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Effect of clinically discriminating, evidence-based checklist items on the reliability of scores from an Internal Medicine residency OSCE.

Authors:  Vijay J Daniels; Georges Bordage; Mark J Gierl; Rachel Yudkowsky
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.853

8.  Do OSCE progress test scores predict performance in a national high-stakes examination?

Authors:  Debra Pugh; Farhan Bhanji; Gary Cole; Jonathan Dupre; Rose Hatala; Susan Humphrey-Murto; Claire Touchie; Timothy J Wood
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  A COMPARISON OF THE OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION AND THE TRADITIONAL ORAL CLINICAL EXAMINATION IN A NIGERIAN UNIVERSITY.

Authors:  K H Tijani; S O Giwa; A O Abiola; A A Adesanya; C C Nwawolo; J O Hassan
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

10.  The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP).

Authors:  Karen L Lewis; Carrie A Bohnert; Wendy L Gammon; Henrike Hölzer; Lorraine Lyman; Cathy Smith; Tonya M Thompson; Amelia Wallace; Gayle Gliva-McConvey
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.