Literature DB >> 33438761

Bayesian group sequential enrichment designs based on adaptive regression of response and survival time on baseline biomarkers.

Yeonhee Park1, Suyu Liu2, Peter F Thall2, Ying Yuan2.   

Abstract

Precision medicine relies on the idea that, for a particular targeted agent, only a subpopulation of patients is sensitive to it and thus may benefit from it therapeutically. In practice, it is often assumed based on preclinical data that a treatment-sensitive subpopulation is known, and moreover that the agent is substantively efficacious in that subpopulation. Due to important differences between preclinical settings and human biology, however, data from patients treated with a new targeted agent often show that one or both of these assumptions are false. This paper provides a Bayesian randomized group sequential enrichment design that compares an experimental treatment to a control based on survival time and uses early response as an ancillary outcome to assist with adaptive variable selection and enrichment. Initially, the design enrolls patients under broad eligibility criteria. At each interim decision, submodels for regression of response and survival time on a baseline covariate vector and treatment are fit; variable selection is used to identify a covariate subvector that characterizes treatment-sensitive patients and determines a personalized benefit index, and comparative superiority and futility decisions are made. Enrollment of each cohort is restricted to the most recent adaptively identified treatment-sensitive patients. Group sequential decision cutoffs are calibrated to control overall type I error and account for the adaptive enrollment restriction. The design provides a basis for precision medicine by identifying a treatment-sensitive subpopulation, if it exists, and determining whether the experimental treatment is superior to the control in that subpopulation. A simulation study shows that the proposed design reliably identifies a sensitive subpopulation, yields much higher generalized power compared to several existing enrichment designs and a conventional all-comers group sequential design, and is robust.
© 2021 The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive enrichment design; clinical trial; joint variable selection; piecewise exponential distribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33438761      PMCID: PMC9178782          DOI: 10.1111/biom.13421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   1.701


  19 in total

1.  Bayesian estimators for conditional hazard functions.

Authors:  I W McKeague; M Tighiouart
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Adaptive sample size calculations in group sequential trials.

Authors:  W Lehmacher; G Wassmer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Seamlessly expanding a randomized phase II trial to phase III.

Authors:  Lurdes Y T Inoue; Peter F Thall; Donald A Berry
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.

Authors:  Martin Jenkins; Andrew Stone; Christopher Jennison
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 1.894

5.  BOP2: Bayesian optimal design for phase II clinical trials with simple and complex endpoints.

Authors:  Heng Zhou; J Jack Lee; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Using Bayesian modeling in frequentist adaptive enrichment designs.

Authors:  Noah Simon; Richard Simon
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials.

Authors:  Noah Simon; Richard Simon
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology.

Authors:  Werner Brannath; Emmanuel Zuber; Michael Branson; Frank Bretz; Paul Gallo; Martin Posch; Amy Racine-Poon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The cross-validated adaptive signature design.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Wenyu Jiang; Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Estimation after subpopulation selection in adaptive seamless trials.

Authors:  Peter K Kimani; Susan Todd; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and opportunities in biomarker-driven trials: adaptive randomization.

Authors:  Yeonhee Park
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

2.  Enrichment Bayesian design for randomized clinical trials using categorical biomarkers and a binary outcome.

Authors:  Valentin Vinnat; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 3.  A Causal Framework for Making Individualized Treatment Decisions in Oncology.

Authors:  Pavlos Msaouel; Juhee Lee; Jose A Karam; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Personalized Risk-Based Screening Design for Comparative Two-Arm Group Sequential Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Yeonhee Park
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.