Literature DB >> 20068112

The cross-validated adaptive signature design.

Boris Freidlin1, Wenyu Jiang, Richard Simon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many anticancer therapies benefit only a subset of treated patients and may be overlooked by the traditional broad eligibility approach to design phase III clinical trials. New biotechnologies such as microarrays can be used to identify the patients that are most likely to benefit from anticancer therapies. However, due to the high-dimensional nature of the genomic data, developing a reliable classifier by the time the definitive phase III trail is designed may not be feasible. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Previously, Freidlin and Simon (Clinical Cancer Research, 2005) introduced the adaptive signature design that combines a prospective development of a sensitive patient classifier and a properly powered test for overall effect in a single pivotal trial. In this article, we propose a cross-validation extension of the adaptive signature design that optimizes the efficiency of both the classifier development and the validation components of the design.
RESULTS: The new design is evaluated through simulations and is applied to data from a randomized breast cancer trial.
CONCLUSION: The cross-validation approach is shown to considerably improve the performance of the adaptive signature design. We also describe approaches to the estimation of the treatment effect for the identified sensitive subpopulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20068112     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  50 in total

Review 1.  Integrating predictive biomarkers and classifiers into oncology clinical development programmes.

Authors:  Robert A Beckman; Jason Clark; Cong Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Clinical trials for predictive medicine: new challenges and paradigms.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stephen J Ruberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Designing a randomized clinical trial to evaluate personalized medicine: a new approach based on risk prediction.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Lessons learned from BATTLE-2 in the war on cancer: the use of Bayesian method in clinical trial design.

Authors:  Chul Kim; Giuseppe Giaccone
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

6.  Design of clinical trials for biomarker research in oncology.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2011-12

7.  Testing Overall and Subpopulation Treatment Effects with Measurement Errors.

Authors:  Yanyuan Ma; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.261

Review 8.  Biomarker-Driven Oncology Clinical Trials: Key Design Elements, Types, Features, and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Chen Hu; James J Dignam
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

9.  Single index methods for evaluation of marker-guided treatment rules based on multivariate marker panels.

Authors:  Veronika Skrivankova; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Adaptive randomized phase II design for biomarker threshold selection and independent evaluation.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Christina M Coughlin; Axel M Grothey; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.