Literature DB >> 28520893

Using Bayesian modeling in frequentist adaptive enrichment designs.

Noah Simon1, Richard Simon2.   

Abstract

Our increased understanding of the mechanistic heterogeneity of diseases has pushed the development of targeted therapeutics. We do not expect all patients with a given disease to benefit from a targeted drug; only those in the target population. That is, those with sufficient dysregulation in the biomolecular pathway targeted by treatment. However, due to complexity of the pathway, and/or technical issues with our characterizing assay, it is often hard to characterize the target population until well into large-scale clinical trials. This has stimulated the development of adaptive enrichment trials; clinical trials in which the target population is adaptively learned; and enrollment criteria are adaptively updated to reflect this growing understanding. This paper proposes a framework for group-sequential adaptive enrichment trials. Building on the work of Simon & Simon (2013). Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials. Biostatistics 14(4), 613-625), it includes a frequentist hypothesis test at the end of the trial. However, it uses Bayesian methods to optimize the decisions required during the trial (regarding how to restrict enrollment) and Bayesian methods to estimate effect size, and characterize the target population at the end of the trial. This joint frequentist/Bayesian design combines the power of Bayesian methods for decision making with the use of a formal hypothesis test at the end of the trial to preserve the studywise probability of a type I error.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive enrichment; Bayesian statistics; Clinical trials

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28520893      PMCID: PMC6075009          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  23 in total

1.  Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: general concepts.

Authors:  Frank Bretz; Heinz Schmidli; Franz König; Amy Racine; Willi Maurer
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Population enrichment designs: case study of a large multinational trial.

Authors:  Cyrus R Mehta; Ping Gao
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Optimal Tests of Treatment Effects for the Overall Population and Two Subpopulations in Randomized Trials, using Sparse Linear Programming.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Han Liu; En-Hsu Yen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Optimizing randomized trial designs to distinguish which subpopulations benefit from treatment.

Authors:  M Rosenblum; M J Van der Laan
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials.

Authors:  S F Assmann; S J Pocock; L E Enos; L E Kasten
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Approaches to evaluation of treatment effect in randomized clinical trials with genomic subset.

Authors:  Sue-Jane Wang; Robert T O'Neill; H M James Hung
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.894

7.  Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Carsten Bokemeyer; Igor Bondarenko; Anatoly Makhson; Joerg T Hartmann; Jorge Aparicio; Filippo de Braud; Serban Donea; Heinz Ludwig; Gunter Schuch; Christopher Stroh; Anja H Loos; Angela Zubel; Piotr Koralewski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward S Kim; Roy S Herbst; Ignacio I Wistuba; J Jack Lee; George R Blumenschein; Anne Tsao; David J Stewart; Marshall E Hicks; Jeremy Erasmus; Sanjay Gupta; Christine M Alden; Suyu Liu; Ximing Tang; Fadlo R Khuri; Hai T Tran; Bruce E Johnson; John V Heymach; Li Mao; Frank Fossella; Merrill S Kies; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Suzanne E Davis; Scott M Lippman; Waun K Hong
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  Bayesian adaptive design for targeted therapy development in lung cancer--a step toward personalized medicine.

Authors:  Xian Zhou; Suyu Liu; Edward S Kim; Roy S Herbst; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Adaptive designs for subpopulation analysis optimizing utility functions.

Authors:  Alexandra C Graf; Martin Posch; Franz Koenig
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.207

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian Approaches to Subgroup Analysis and Related Adaptive Clinical Trial Designs.

Authors:  Ciara Nugent; Wentian Guo; Peter Müller; Yuan Ji
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

2.  A nonparametric Bayesian basket trial design.

Authors:  Yanxun Xu; Peter Müller; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Donald Berry
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  Adaptive Enrichment Designs in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Peter F Thall
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 7.917

Review 4.  Challenges, opportunities, and innovative statistical designs for precision oncology trials.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Shihao Shen; Qian Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

5.  Auxiliary variable-enriched biomarker-stratified design.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Xiaofei Wang; Haibo Zhou; Jianwen Cai; Stephen L George
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Bayesian group sequential enrichment designs based on adaptive regression of response and survival time on baseline biomarkers.

Authors:  Yeonhee Park; Suyu Liu; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 1.701

7.  Point estimation following two-stage adaptive threshold enrichment clinical trials.

Authors:  Peter K Kimani; Susan Todd; Lindsay A Renfro; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Enrichment Bayesian design for randomized clinical trials using categorical biomarkers and a binary outcome.

Authors:  Valentin Vinnat; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Design and analysis of biomarker-integrated clinical trials with adaptive threshold detection and flexible patient enrichment.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Xiaofei Wang; Stephen L George; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 10.  Arguing for Adaptive Clinical Trials in Sepsis.

Authors:  Victor B Talisa; Sachin Yende; Christopher W Seymour; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 7.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.