Literature DB >> 23525452

Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials.

Noah Simon1, Richard Simon.   

Abstract

Modern medicine has graduated from broad spectrum treatments to targeted therapeutics. New drugs recognize the recently discovered heterogeneity of many diseases previously considered to be fairly homogeneous. These treatments attack specific genetic pathways which are only dysregulated in some smaller subset of patients with the disease. Often this subset is only rudimentarily understood until well into large-scale clinical trials. As such, standard practice has been to enroll a broad range of patients and run post hoc subset analysis to determine those who may particularly benefit. This unnecessarily exposes many patients to hazardous side effects, and may vastly decrease the efficiency of the trial (especially if only a small subset of patients benefit). In this manuscript, we propose a class of adaptive enrichment designs that allow the eligibility criteria of a trial to be adaptively updated during the trial, restricting entry to patients likely to benefit from the new treatment. We show that our designs both preserve the type 1 error, and in a variety of cases provide a substantial increase in power.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive clinical trials; Biomarker; Cutpoint; Enrichment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23525452      PMCID: PMC3769998          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  18 in total

1.  Adaptive group sequential designs for clinical trials: combining the advantages of adaptive and of classical group sequential approaches.

Authors:  H H Müller; H Schäfer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Parallel paths to predictive biomarkers in oncology: Uncoupling of emergent biomarker development and phase III trial execution.

Authors:  Robert Sikorski; Bin Yao
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  The role of companion diagnostics in the development and use of mutation-targeted cancer therapies.

Authors:  Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Target practice: oncology drug development in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Optimizing randomized trial designs to distinguish which subpopulations benefit from treatment.

Authors:  M Rosenblum; M J Van der Laan
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Interim analyses for randomized clinical trials: the group sequential approach.

Authors:  S J Pocock
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  On the efficiency of targeted clinical trials.

Authors:  A Maitournam; R Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  A group sequential, response-adaptive design for randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Theodore G Karrison; Dezheng Huo; Rick Chappell
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2003-10

9.  Approaches to evaluation of treatment effect in randomized clinical trials with genomic subset.

Authors:  Sue-Jane Wang; Robert T O'Neill; H M James Hung
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.894

10.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward S Kim; Roy S Herbst; Ignacio I Wistuba; J Jack Lee; George R Blumenschein; Anne Tsao; David J Stewart; Marshall E Hicks; Jeremy Erasmus; Sanjay Gupta; Christine M Alden; Suyu Liu; Ximing Tang; Fadlo R Khuri; Hai T Tran; Bruce E Johnson; John V Heymach; Li Mao; Frank Fossella; Merrill S Kies; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Suzanne E Davis; Scott M Lippman; Waun K Hong
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 39.397

View more
  47 in total

1.  Two-stage adaptive enrichment design for testing an active factor.

Authors:  A Adam Ding; Samuel S Wu; Natalie E Dean; Rachel S Zahigian
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Using Bayesian modeling in frequentist adaptive enrichment designs.

Authors:  Noah Simon; Richard Simon
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Intensive care medicine in 2050: clinical trials designs.

Authors:  M Gasparini; S Chevret
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Point and interval estimation in two-stage adaptive designs with time to event data and biomarker-driven subpopulation selection.

Authors:  Peter K Kimani; Susan Todd; Lindsay A Renfro; Ekkehard Glimm; Josephine N Khan; John A Kairalla; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Improving efficiency and reducing costs: Design of an adaptive, seamless, and enriched pragmatic efficacy trial of an online asthma management program.

Authors:  Mei Lu; Dennis R Ownby; Edward Zoratti; Douglas Roblin; Dayna Johnson; Christine Cole Johnson; Christine L M Joseph
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  Bayesian Approaches to Subgroup Analysis and Related Adaptive Clinical Trial Designs.

Authors:  Ciara Nugent; Wentian Guo; Peter Müller; Yuan Ji
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

Review 7.  Biomarker-Driven Oncology Clinical Trials: Key Design Elements, Types, Features, and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Chen Hu; James J Dignam
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

8.  Biomarker threshold adaptive designs for survival endpoints.

Authors:  Guoqing Diao; Jun Dong; Donglin Zeng; Chunlei Ke; Alan Rong; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  Active Clinical Trials for Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Stanislav Minsker; Ying-Qi Zhao; Guang Cheng
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Using the Bayesian credible subgroups method to identify populations benefiting from treatment: An application to the Look AHEAD trial.

Authors:  Anna Coonan; Patrick Schnell; Joel Smith; John Forbes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.