Literature DB >> 3748081

How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability.

A Kong, G O Barnett, F Mosteller, C Youtz.   

Abstract

Qualitative expressions of probability, such as "likely," have different numerical meanings to different people, which can lead to misunderstanding among physicians and between physicians and patients. In a study conducted through a nationwide interactive computer network based at Massachusetts General Hospital, we gathered information on the meaning of common expressions of probability. Three groups of medical professionals assigned percentage values to 12 expressions of the probability that a given symptom would appear in a patient with an unspecified disease. The median values assigned to these expressions by physicians, medical students, and other professionals were almost the same. Comparisons of the means for 7 of these 12 expressions with those found in an earlier study by other investigators showed that they were quantified in the same order, although they had not been assigned the same numerical values. This degree of agreement among professionals and between studies is encouraging for the future prospects of codifying the meaning of such expressions. The variation among five studies in the mean values assigned to 37 expressions in the medical literature and the variation among individual opinions show that such codification is necessary. In the meantime, the average numerical values presented here for various qualitative expressions of probability could well be used to enhance communication among medical professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3748081     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198609183151206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  48 in total

Review 1.  Risk communication in the patient-health professional relationship.

Authors:  S Buetow; J Cantrill; B Sibbald
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1998-09

2.  A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care units.

Authors:  Susan J Lee Char; Leah R Evans; Grace L Malvar; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Burkell
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-04

4.  Interpretation of probability terms.

Authors:  W O Robertson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Structured reporting using a shared indexed multilingual radiology lexicon.

Authors:  Roberto Stramare; Giuliano Scattolin; Valeria Beltrame; Marco Gerardi; Marco Sommavilla; Cristina Gatto; Paolo Mosca; Leopoldo Rubaltelli; Carlo Riccardo Rossi; Claudio Saccavini
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Customization of medical report data.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Clarification of terminology in drug safety.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations.

Authors:  Shlomi Codish; Richard N Shiffman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

9.  Words or numbers? The evaluation of probability expressions in general practice.

Authors:  B J O'Brien
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-03

10.  How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients?

Authors:  J A Tulsky; M A Chesney; B Lo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.