Literature DB >> 15893211

How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey.

Angela Fagerlin1, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Peter A Ubel.   

Abstract

Counseling women about breast cancer risks has been found to decrease screening compliance. We investigated whether women's reactions to risk information are an artifact of requiring women to estimate the risk of breast cancer prior to receiving risk information. Three hundred and fifty-six women were randomized to either make or not make a risk estimate prior to receiving risk information. Outcome measures were participants' estimates of the average woman's breast cancer risk and their emotional response to the risk information. Women overestimated the lifetime risk of breast cancer (M = 46%). Women who made risk estimates felt more relieved about the risk and perceived the risk as being lower than women who did not make estimates (p's < 0.001). Asking people to estimate risks influenced their subsequent perceptions of the risk of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15893211     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  29 in total

1.  Effect of various risk/benefit trade-offs on parents' understanding of a pediatric research study.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Terri Voepel-Lewis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Disclosure and rationality: comparative risk information and decision-making about prevention.

Authors:  Peter H Schwartz
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Decision making and cancer.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Wendy L Nelson; Paul K Han; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2015 Feb-Mar

4.  A formal model of fuzzy-trace theory: Variations on framing effects and the Allais paradox.

Authors:  David A Broniatowski; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2017-05-29

5.  Genetic Testing and Post-Testing Decision Making among BRCA-Positive Mutation Women: A Psychosocial Approach.

Authors:  Sharlene Hesse-Biber; Chen An
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Decision tool to improve the quality of care in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Ellen Peters; Peter Charpentier; Blair Olsen; Lanette Errante; Robert T Schoen; Valerie Reyna
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 7.  Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-23

8.  Communicating treatment risk reduction to people with low numeracy skills: a cross-cultural comparison.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Mirta Galesic
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Aid-assisted decision making and colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul C Schroy; Karen M Emmons; Ellen Peters; Julie T Glick; Patricia A Robinson; Maria A Lydotes; Shamini R Mylvaganam; Alison M Coe; Clara A Chen; Christine E Chaisson; Michael P Pignone; Marianne N Prout; Peter K Davidson; Timothy C Heeren
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Using a Non-Fit Message Helps to De-Intensify Negative Reactions to Tough Advice.

Authors:  Ilona Fridman; Karen A Scherr; Paul A Glare; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.