Literature DB >> 33401454

An Extension of the Bland-Altman Plot for Analyzing the Agreement of More than Two Raters.

Sören Möller1,2, Birgit Debrabant3, Ulrich Halekoh3, Andreas Kristian Petersen4, Oke Gerke1,5.   

Abstract

The Bland-Altman plot is the most common method to analyze and visualize agreement between raters or methods of quantitative outcomes in health research. While very useful for studies with two raters, a limitation of the classical Bland-Altman plot is that it is specifically used for studies with two raters. We propose an extension of the Bland-Altman plot suitable for more than two raters and derive the approximate limits of agreement with 95% confidence intervals. We validated the suggested limit of agreement by a simulation study. Moreover, we offer suggestions on how to present bias, heterogeneity among raters, as well as the uncertainty of the limits of agreement. The resulting plot could be utilized to investigate and present agreement in studies with more than two raters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bland–Altman plot; agreement; inter-rater; intra-rater; method comparison; simulation study; visualization

Year:  2021        PMID: 33401454      PMCID: PMC7824071          DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11010054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


  22 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Multiple method comparison: statistical model using percentage similarity.

Authors:  Lesley E Scott; Jacky S Galpin; Deborah K Glencross
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.058

3.  Measurement of blood glucose: comparison between different types of specimens.

Authors:  Bendix Carstensen; J Lindström; J Sundvall; K Borch-Johnsen; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.057

4.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies with heteroscedastic measurements.

Authors:  Lakshika S Nawarathna; Pankaj K Choudhary
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A graphical method for assessing agreement with the mean between multiple observers using continuous measures.

Authors:  Mark Jones; Annette Dobson; Sue O'Brian
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Comparing methods of measurement: Extending the LoA by regression.

Authors:  Bendix Carstensen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Exact parametric confidence intervals for Bland-Altman limits of agreement.

Authors:  Andrew Carkeet
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  MethodCompare: An R package to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies.

Authors:  Patrick Taffé; Mingkai Peng; Victoria Stagg; Tyler Williamson
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Quantification of tissue volume in the hindlimb of mice using microcomputed tomography images and analysing software.

Authors:  Alexander Wiinholt; Oke Gerke; Farima Dalaei; Amar Bučan; Christoffer Bing Madsen; Jens Ahm Sørensen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.