Literature DB >> 25650900

Exact parametric confidence intervals for Bland-Altman limits of agreement.

Andrew Carkeet1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The previous literature on Bland-Altman analysis only describes approximate methods for calculating confidence intervals for 95% limits of agreement (LoAs). This article describes exact methods for calculating such confidence intervals based on the assumption that differences in measurement pairs are normally distributed.
METHODS: Two basic situations are considered for calculating LoA confidence intervals: the first, where LoAs are considered individually (i.e., using one-sided tolerance factors for a normal distribution); and the second, where LoAs are considered as a pair (i.e., using two-sided tolerance factors for a normal distribution). Equations underlying the calculation of exact confidence limits are briefly outlined.
RESULTS: To assist in determining confidence intervals for LoAs (considered individually and as a pair), tables of coefficients have been included for degrees of freedom between 1 and 1000. Numerical examples, showing the use of the tables for calculating confidence limits for Bland-Altman LoAs, have been provided.
CONCLUSIONS: Exact confidence intervals for LoAs can differ considerably from the Bland and Altman approximate method, especially for sample sizes that are not large. There are better, more precise methods for calculating confidence intervals for LoAs than the Bland and Altman approximate method, although even an approximate calculation of confidence intervals for LoAs is likely to be better than none at all. Reporting confidence limits for LoAs considered as a pair is appropriate for most situations; however, there may be circumstances where it is appropriate to report confidence limits for LoAs considered individually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25650900     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  37 in total

1.  Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded.

Authors:  František Pluháček; John Siderov
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Point quantification elastography in the evaluation of liver elasticity in healthy volunteers: a reliability study based on operator expertise.

Authors:  Cristina Felicani; Chiara De Molo; Horia Stefanescu; Fabio Conti; Elena Mazzotta; Veronica Gabusi; Elena Nardi; Antonio Maria Morselli-Labate; Pietro Andreone; Carla Serra
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-05-22

3.  Verification of pharmacogenomics-based algorithms to predict warfarin maintenance dose using registered data of Japanese patients.

Authors:  Maki Sasano; Masako Ohno; Yuya Fukuda; Shinpei Nonen; Sachiko Hirobe; Shinichiro Maeda; Yoshihiro Miwa; Junya Yokoyama; Hiroyuki Nakayama; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yoshiki Sawa; Yasushi Fujio; Makiko Maeda
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.

Authors:  Mylan T Nguyen; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Ocular Biometric Diurnal Rhythms in Emmetropic and Myopic Adults.

Authors:  Hannah J Burfield; Nimesh B Patel; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Validity and Usability of Physical Activity Monitoring in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Authors:  Tobias Boeselt; Marc Spielmanns; Christoph Nell; Jan Hendrik Storre; Wolfram Windisch; Lena Magerhans; Bjoern Beutel; Klaus Kenn; Timm Greulich; Peter Alter; Claus Vogelmeier; Andreas Rembert Koczulla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Relationship between vessel diameter and depth measurements within the limbus using ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Emmanuel Alabi; Natalie Hutchings; Kostadinka Bizheva; Trefford Simpson
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-06-17

8.  Combination of near-infrared and thermal imaging techniques for the remote and simultaneous measurements of breathing and heart rates under sleep situation.

Authors:  Menghan Hu; Guangtao Zhai; Duo Li; Yezhao Fan; Huiyu Duan; Wenhan Zhu; Xiaokang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The repeatability and reproducibility of four techniques for measuring horizontal heterophoria: Implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Nicola S Anstice; Bianca Davidson; Bridget Field; Joyce Mathan; Andrew V Collins; Joanna M Black
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-08-12

10.  The modified Thomas test is not a valid measure of hip extension unless pelvic tilt is controlled.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Gregory J Lehman; Chris Beardsley; Bret Contreras; Bryan Chung; Erin H Feser
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.