Literature DB >> 18325176

Measurement of blood glucose: comparison between different types of specimens.

Bendix Carstensen1, J Lindström, J Sundvall, K Borch-Johnsen, J Tuomilehto.   

Abstract

AIM: To provide conversion formulae between measurements based on different specimens in use in epidemiological studies and clinical practice, and to evaluate the relative precision for the different methods.
BACKGROUND: The current guidelines emphasize the use of venous plasma for determining glucose concentration. Nevertheless, the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines provide cut-off points for different specimens for the determination of the glucose concentration in circulating blood (venous plasma, whole blood, serum and capillary blood). There is a lack of data about the comparability between the values obtained by using different specimens.
METHODS: Eleven different combinations of specimens and methods of measurement of blood glucose were used in 294 blood samples from 74 subjects. The methods were grouped by the specimen used for analysis (venous plasma, whole blood, serum and capillary blood).
RESULTS: The result of the analysis is a set of linear equations allowing conversion of the result from one specimen or method to another. Furthermore, it was estimated how much of the variation for each method can be attributed to laboratory variance.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements based on capillary blood had a very large variability compared with other methods. Measurements based on venous whole blood tended to give results 0.5 mmol/L lower than other methods. Our data indicate that the current diagnostic cut-off points, as recommended by WHO for non-plasma specimens, are not fully compatible and may differ as much as 0.5 mmol/L between specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18325176     DOI: 10.1258/acb.2007.006212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  15 in total

1.  The correlation of hemoglobin A1c to blood glucose.

Authors:  Ken Sikaris
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-01

2.  Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David B Sacks; Mark Arnold; George L Bakris; David E Bruns; Andrea Rita Horvath; M Sue Kirkman; Ake Lernmark; Boyd E Metzger; David M Nathan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 3.  Challenges to glycemic measurement in the perioperative and critically ill patient: a review.

Authors:  Andrew D Pitkin; Mark J Rice
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01

4.  Soluble CD163, adiponectin, C-reactive protein and progression of dysglycaemia in individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the ADDITION-PRO cohort.

Authors:  Pia Deichgræber; Daniel R Witte; Holger J Møller; Mette V Skriver; Bjørn Richelsen; Marit E Jørgensen; Nanna B Johansen; Annelli Sandbæk
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Blood glucose measurement in the intensive care unit: what is the best method?

Authors:  Huong T Le; Neil S Harris; Abby J Estilong; Arvid Olson; Mark J Rice
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01

Review 6.  A1C versus glucose testing: a comparison.

Authors:  David B Sacks
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes need improved management: a report from the EUROASPIRE IV survey: a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Viveca Gyberg; Dirk De Bacquer; Guy De Backer; Catriona Jennings; Kornelia Kotseva; Linda Mellbin; Oliver Schnell; Jaakko Tuomilehto; David Wood; Lars Rydén; Philippe Amouyel; Jan Bruthans; Almudena Castro Conde; Renata Cifkova; Jaap W Deckers; Johan De Sutter; Mirza Dilic; Maryna Dolzhenko; Andrejs Erglis; Zlatko Fras; Dan Gaita; Nina Gotcheva; John Goudevenos; Peter Heuschmann; Aleksandras Laucevicius; Seppo Lehto; Dragan Lovic; Davor Miličić; David Moore; Evagoras Nicolaides; Raphael Oganov; Andrzej Pająk; Nana Pogosova; Zeljko Reiner; Martin Stagmo; Stefan Störk; Lale Tokgözoğlu; Dusko Vulic
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 9.951

8.  A Potential Issue with Screening Prediabetes or Diabetes Using Serum Glucose: A Delay in Diagnosis.

Authors:  Jun Goo Kang; Cheol-Young Park; Sung-Hee Ihm; Sung Woo Park
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.376

9.  Seasonal Pattern in the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Southern Sweden.

Authors:  Anastasia Katsarou; Rickard Claesson; Claes Ignell; Nael Shaat; Kerstin Berntorp
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.011

10.  Time-saving screening for diabetes in patients with coronary artery disease: a report from EUROASPIRE IV.

Authors:  Viveca Gyberg; Dirk De Bacquer; Kornelia Kotseva; Guy De Backer; Oliver Schnell; Jaakko Tuomilehto; David Wood; Lars Rydén
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.