Literature DB >> 33398708

Non-Pregnant and Pregnant Women's Femininity Preferences in Male Faces: Tests Based on Within- and Between-Sex Sexual Dimorphism Facial Manipulations.

Fangfang Wen1, Bin Zuo2, Yang Wang1, Shuhan Ma1, Shijie Song1, Hongxia Zhang3.   

Abstract

Past research on women's preferences for male facial masculinity in Western cultures has produced inconsistent results. Some inconsistency may be related to the use of different facial stimulus manipulations (e.g., between-sex sexual dimorphic facial manipulation or within-sex sexual dimorphic facial manipulation) that do not perfectly avoid non-facial cues, and pregnancy status may also influence women's face preferences. We therefore recruited pregnant and nonpregnant Chinese women and manipulated the sexual dimorphism of male facial stimuli to explore the influences of manipulation methods, non-facial cues, and pregnancy status on face preferences. Results showed that: (1) in contrast with a general masculinity preference observed in Western cultures, both pregnant and nonpregnant Chinese women preferred feminized and neutral male faces generally; (2) pregnant women's preference for feminized male faces was stable across manipulation methods, while nonpregnant women preferred feminized male faces except under between-sex sexual dimorphism manipulation; and (3) manipulation methods, rather than non-facial cues, influenced participants' face preferences. Specifically, women showed the strongest preferences for femininity when face stimuli were manipulated by within-sex sexual dimorphic facial manipulation, followed by unmanipulated faces and between-sex sexual dimorphic facial manipulation. This effect was stronger for nonpregnant women in the unmanipulated condition and for pregnant women in the between-sex sexual dimorphic facial manipulation. This research provides empirical evidence of women's preferences for sexual dimorphism in male faces in a non-Western culture, as well as the effects of facial manipulation methods, pregnancy status, and the interactions between these factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial attractiveness; Facial manipulation; Pregnancy; Sexual dimorphism

Year:  2021        PMID: 33398708     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-020-01868-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  31 in total

Review 1.  Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how?

Authors:  R Bender; S Lange
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Gaze properties of women judging the attractiveness of masculine and feminine male faces.

Authors:  Robert P Burriss; Urszula M Marcinkowska; Minna T Lyons
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2014-01-08

3.  Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kelly Gildersleeve; Martie G Haselton; Melissa R Fales
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Does the interaction between partnership status and average progesterone level predict women's preferences for facial masculinity?

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Amanda C Hahn; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Mothers are sensitive to men's beards as a potential cue of paternal investment.

Authors:  Barnaby J W Dixson; Siobhan Kennedy-Costantini; Anthony J Lee; Nicole L Nelson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  The measurement of psychological androgyny.

Authors:  S L Bem
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1974-04

7.  Women's preferences for men's beards show no relation to their ovarian cycle phase and sex hormone levels.

Authors:  Barnaby J W Dixson; Anthony J Lee; Khandis R Blake; Grazyna Jasienska; Urszula M Marcinkowska
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Hormonal effects on women's facial masculinity preferences: the influence of pregnancy, post-partum, and hormonal contraceptive use.

Authors:  Kelly D Cobey; Anthony C Little; S Craig Roberts
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Finlay G Smith; Anthony C Little
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Human oestrus.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Randy Thornhill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.