Literature DB >> 24564172

Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review.

Kelly Gildersleeve1, Martie G Haselton1, Melissa R Fales1.   

Abstract

Scientific interest in whether women experience changes across the ovulatory cycle in mating-related motivations, preferences, cognitions, and behaviors has surged in the past 2 decades. A prominent hypothesis in this area, the ovulatory shift hypothesis, posits that women experience elevated immediate sexual attraction on high- relative to low-fertility days of the cycle to men with characteristics that reflected genetic quality ancestrally. Dozens of published studies have aimed to test this hypothesis, with some reporting null effects. We conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate support for the pattern of cycle shifts predicted by the ovulatory shift hypothesis in a total sample of 134 effects from 38 published and 12 unpublished studies. Consistent with the hypothesis, analyses revealed robust cycle shifts that were specific to women's preferences for hypothesized cues of (ancestral) genetic quality (96 effects in 50 studies). Cycle shifts were present when women evaluated men's "short-term" attractiveness and absent when women evaluated men's "long-term" attractiveness. More focused analyses identified specific characteristics for which cycle shifts were or were not robust and revealed areas in need of more research. Finally, we used several methods to assess potential bias due to an underrepresentation of small effects in the meta-analysis sample or to "researcher degrees of freedom" in definitions of high- and low-fertility cycle phases. Neither type of bias appeared to account for the observed cycle shifts. The existence of robust relationship context-dependent cycle shifts in women's mate preferences has implications for understanding the role of evolved psychological mechanisms and the ovulatory cycle in women's attractions and social behavior. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24564172     DOI: 10.1037/a0035438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  32 in total

1.  Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness.

Authors:  Aaron Sell; Aaron W Lukazsweski; Michael Townsley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Stability of women's facial shape throughout the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  U M Marcinkowska; I J Holzleitner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Menstrual Cycle Changes in Daily Sexual Motivation and Behavior Among Sexually Diverse Cisgender Women.

Authors:  Lisa M Diamond; Janna A Dickenson; Karen L Blair
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-01-14

4.  The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.

Authors:  Justin K Mogilski; Lisa L M Welling
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

5.  Effects of Women's Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men's Waist to Chest Ratios.

Authors:  Ray Garza; Jennifer Byrd-Craven
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-14

6.  Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel.

Authors:  Isabel M Scott; Andrew P Clark; Steven C Josephson; Adam H Boyette; Innes C Cuthill; Ruby L Fried; Mhairi A Gibson; Barry S Hewlett; Mark Jamieson; William Jankowiak; P Lynne Honey; Zejun Huang; Melissa A Liebert; Benjamin G Purzycki; John H Shaver; J Josh Snodgrass; Richard Sosis; Lawrence S Sugiyama; Viren Swami; Douglas W Yu; Yangke Zhao; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evolution, the Menstrual Cycle, and Theoretical Overreach.

Authors:  Jeff Kiesner; Tory Eisenlohr-Moul; Jane Mendle
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06-15

Review 8.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-06

9.  Effects of Male Facial Masculinity on Perceived Attractiveness.

Authors:  Omid Ekrami; Peter Claes; Mark D Shriver; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Susan Walsh; Stefan Van Dongen
Journal:  Adapt Human Behav Physiol       Date:  2020-11-12

10.  Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Human Appearance Enhancements.

Authors:  Barnaby J W Dixson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.