Literature DB >> 24401278

Gaze properties of women judging the attractiveness of masculine and feminine male faces.

Robert P Burriss1, Urszula M Marcinkowska2, Minna T Lyons3.   

Abstract

Most studies of female facial masculinity preference have relied upon self-reported preference, with participants selecting or rating the attractiveness of faces that differ in masculinity. However, researchers have not established a consensus as to whether women's general preference is for male faces that are masculine or feminine, and several studies have indicated that women prefer neither. We investigated women's preferences for male facial masculinity using standard two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) preference trials, paired with eye tracking measures, to determine whether conscious and non-conscious measures of preference yield similar results. We found that women expressed a preference for, gazed longer at, and fixated more frequently on feminized male faces. We also found effects of relationship status, relationship context (whether faced are judged for attractiveness as a long- or short-term partner), and hormonal contraceptive use. These results support previous findings that women express a preference for feminized over masculinized male faces, demonstrate that non-conscious measures of preference for this trait echo consciously expressed preferences, and suggest that certain aspects of the preference decision-making process may be better captured by eye tracking than by 2AFC preference trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24401278     DOI: 10.1556/jep.12.2014.1.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Psychol        ISSN: 1474-7049


  7 in total

1.  Stability of women's facial shape throughout the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  U M Marcinkowska; I J Holzleitner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Dominance or Integration? Influence of Sexual Dimorphism and Clothing Color on Judgments of Male and Female Targets' Attractiveness, Warmth, and Competence.

Authors:  Fangfang Wen; Yalan Qiao; Bin Zuo; Hanxue Ye; Yu Ding; Qi Wang; Shuhan Ma
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Effects of Women's Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men's Waist to Chest Ratios.

Authors:  Ray Garza; Jennifer Byrd-Craven
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-14

4.  Oxidative stress as a hidden cost of attractiveness in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Urszula M Marcinkowska; Anna Ziomkiewicz; Karel Kleisner; Andrzej Galbarczyk; Magdalena Klimek; Amelia Sancilio; Grazyna Jasienska; Richard G Bribiescas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Non-Pregnant and Pregnant Women's Femininity Preferences in Male Faces: Tests Based on Within- and Between-Sex Sexual Dimorphism Facial Manipulations.

Authors:  Fangfang Wen; Bin Zuo; Yang Wang; Shuhan Ma; Shijie Song; Hongxia Zhang
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-01-04

6.  A Comparison of Masculinity Facial Preference Among Naturally Cycling, Pregnant, Lactating, and Post-Menopausal Women.

Authors:  Urszula M Marcinkowska; Grazyna Jasienska; Pavol Prokop
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2017-10-25

7.  Women's self-rated attraction to male faces does not correspond with physiological arousal.

Authors:  S Hagerman; Z Woolard; K Anderson; B W Tatler; F R Moore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.