Literature DB >> 30978339

Mothers are sensitive to men's beards as a potential cue of paternal investment.

Barnaby J W Dixson1, Siobhan Kennedy-Costantini2, Anthony J Lee3, Nicole L Nelson4.   

Abstract

Mating strategy theories assert that women's preferences for androgen dependent traits in men are stronger when the costs of reduced paternal investment are lowest. Past research has shown that preferences for facial masculinity are stronger among nulliparous and non-pregnant women than pregnant or parous women. In two studies, we examine patterns in women's preferences for men's facial hair - likely the most visually conspicuous and sexually dimorphic of men's secondary sexual traits - when evaluating men's masculinity, dominance, age, fathering, and attractiveness. Two studies were conducted among heterosexual pregnant women, mothers, non-contractive and contraceptive users. Study 1 used a between-subjects sample (N = 2103) and found that mothers had significantly higher preferences for beards when judging fathering than all other women. Pregnant women and mothers also judged beards as more masculine and older, but less attractive, than non-contractive and contraceptive users. Parous women judged beards higher for age, masculinity and fathering, but lower for attractiveness, than nulliparous women. Irrespective of reproductive status, beards were judged as looking more dominant than clean-shaven faces. Study 2 used a within-subjects design (N = 53) among women surveyed during pregnancy and three months post-partum. Judgments of parenting skills were higher for bearded stimuli during pregnancy among women having their first baby, whereas among parous women parenting skills judgments for bearded stimuli were higher post-partum. Our results suggest that mothers are sensitive to beardedness as a masculine secondary sexual characteristic that may denote parental investment, providing evidence that women's mate preferences could reflect sexual selection for direct benefits.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attractiveness; Beards; Facial hair; Motherhood; Pregnancy

Year:  2019        PMID: 30978339     DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Behav        ISSN: 0018-506X            Impact factor:   3.587


  5 in total

1.  The social predictors of paternal antenatal mental health and their associations with maternal mental health in the Queensland Family Cohort prospective study.

Authors:  Barnaby J W Dixson; Danielle Borg; Kym M Rae; Koa Whittingha; Brenda Gannon; Steven M McPhail; Hannah E Carter; Karen M Moritz; Roslyn N Boyd; Samudragupta Bora; Sailesh Kumar; Julanne Frater; Daniel Schweitzer; Paul Miller; Divya Mehter; Vicki L Clifton
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.405

2.  Effects of Male Facial Masculinity on Perceived Attractiveness.

Authors:  Omid Ekrami; Peter Claes; Mark D Shriver; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Susan Walsh; Stefan Van Dongen
Journal:  Adapt Human Behav Physiol       Date:  2020-11-12

3.  Non-Pregnant and Pregnant Women's Femininity Preferences in Male Faces: Tests Based on Within- and Between-Sex Sexual Dimorphism Facial Manipulations.

Authors:  Fangfang Wen; Bin Zuo; Yang Wang; Shuhan Ma; Shijie Song; Hongxia Zhang
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-01-04

4.  Facial hair may slow detection of happy facial expressions in the face in the crowd paradigm.

Authors:  Barnaby J W Dixson; Tamara Spiers; Paul A Miller; Morgan J Sidari; Nicole L Nelson; Belinda M Craig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Human Appearance Enhancements.

Authors:  Barnaby J W Dixson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-03-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.