Literature DB >> 19937818

In silico pKa prediction and ADME profiling.

Gabriele Cruciani1, Francesca Milletti, Loriano Storchi, Gianluca Sforna, Laura Goracci.   

Abstract

Improving the ADME profile of drug candidates is a critical step in lead optimization, and because pKa affects most ADME properties such as lipophilicity, solubility, and metabolism, it is extremely advantageous to predict pKa in order to guide the design of new compounds. However, accurately (<0.5 log units) predicting pKa by empirical methods can be challenging especially for novel series, because of lack of knowledge on determinants of pKa (steric effects, ring effects, H-bonding, etc.), and because of limited experimental data on the effects of specific chemical groups on the ionization of an atom. To address these issues, we recently developed the computational package MoKa, which integrates graphical and command line tools designed for computational and medicinal chemists to predict the pKa values of organic compounds. Here, we present the major issues considered when we developed MoKa, such as the accurate selection of training data, the fundamentals of the methodology (which has also been extended to predict protein pKa), the treatment of multiprotic compounds, and the selection of the dominant tautomer for the calculation. Last, we illustrate some specific applications of MoKa to predict solubility, lipophilicity, and metabolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19937818     DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.200900153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Biodivers        ISSN: 1612-1872            Impact factor:   2.408


  8 in total

1.  High accuracy quantum-chemistry-based calculation and blind prediction of macroscopic pKa values in the context of the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Philipp Pracht; Rainer Wilcken; Anikó Udvarhelyi; Stephane Rodde; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  SAMPL6 challenge results from [Formula: see text] predictions based on a general Gaussian process model.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; David L Mobley; A Geoffrey Skillman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  A high quality, industrial data set for binding affinity prediction: performance comparison in different early drug discovery scenarios.

Authors:  Andreas Tosstorff; Markus G Rudolph; Jason C Cole; Michael Reutlinger; Christian Kramer; Hervé Schaffhauser; Agnès Nilly; Alexander Flohr; Bernd Kuhn
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 4.179

4.  Open-source QSAR models for pKa prediction using multiple machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Kamel Mansouri; Neal F Cariello; Alexandru Korotcov; Valery Tkachenko; Chris M Grulke; Catherine S Sprankle; David Allen; Warren M Casey; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Antony J Williams
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.514

5.  Synthesis and characterization of 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-2-carboxamide-based compounds targeting the PA-PB1 interface of influenza A virus polymerase.

Authors:  Serena Massari; Chiara Bertagnin; Maria Chiara Pismataro; Anna Donnadio; Giulio Nannetti; Tommaso Felicetti; Stefano Di Bona; Maria Giulia Nizi; Leonardo Tensi; Giuseppe Manfroni; Maria Isabel Loza; Stefano Sabatini; Violetta Cecchetti; Jose Brea; Laura Goracci; Arianna Loregian; Oriana Tabarrini
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  PROTACs bearing piperazine-containing linkers: what effect on their protonation state?

Authors:  Jenny Desantis; Andrea Mammoli; Michela Eleuteri; Alice Coletti; Federico Croci; Antonio Macchiarulo; Laura Goracci
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Overview of the SAMPL6 pKa challenge: evaluating small molecule microscopic and macroscopic pKa predictions.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Ariën S Rustenburg; Andrea Rizzi; M R Gunner; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Predicting p Ka values from EEM atomic charges.

Authors:  Radka Svobodová Vařeková; Stanislav Geidl; Crina-Maria Ionescu; Ondřej Skřehota; Tomáš Bouchal; David Sehnal; Ruben Abagyan; Jaroslav Koča
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.514

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.