Literature DB >> 33392696

Dual-tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex does not modulate stop-signal task performance.

Maximilian A Friehs1,2, Lisa Brauner3, Christian Frings3.   

Abstract

Stopping an already initiated action is crucial for human everyday behavior and empirical evidence points toward the prefrontal cortex playing a key role in response inhibition. Two regions that have been consistently implicated in response inhibition are the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the more superior region of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The present study targets both regions with non-invasive brain stimulation to investigate their role in response inhibition. Thus dual-prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was applied to both IFG and DLPFC in a repeated measures design and compared to sham tDCS. Specifically, 9 cm2 electrodes were positioned over both IFG and DLPFC in all groups. The active stimulation groups received off-line, anodal or cathodal tDCS over the IFG and opposite polarity tDCS of the DLPFC, while the sham stimulation group received short stimulation at the start, middle and end of the supposed 20-min stimulation period. Before and after tDCS, subjects' inhibition capabilities were probed using the stop-signal task (SST). In a final sample of N = 45, participants were randomly split into three groups and received three different stimulation protocols. Results indicated that dual-frontal tDCS did not influence performance as compared to sham stimulation. This null result was confirmed using Bayesian analysis. This result is discussed against the background of the limitations of the present study as well as the potential theoretical implications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Network compensation; Response inhibition; Stop-signal task; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33392696     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05995-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

1.  The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The Role of the Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Proactive and Reactive Inhibitory Control: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study.

Authors:  Ying Cai; Siyao Li; Jing Liu; Dawei Li; Zifang Feng; Qiang Wang; Chuansheng Chen; Gui Xue
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Modulating behavioral inhibition by tDCS combined with cognitive training.

Authors:  Thomas Ditye; Liron Jacobson; Vincent Walsh; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Organization of Right Prefrontal Networks Reveals Common Mechanisms of Inhibitory Regulation Across Cognitive, Emotional, and Motor Processes.

Authors:  B E Depue; J M Orr; H R Smolker; F Naaz; M T Banich
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Pimping inhibition: Anodal tDCS enhances stop-signal reaction time.

Authors:  Maximilian A Friehs; Christian Frings
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS.

Authors:  Paula Faria; Mark Hallett; Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Neuronal correlates of ADHD in adults with evidence for compensation strategies--a functional MRI study with a Go/No-Go paradigm.

Authors:  Wolfgang Dillo; Andres Göke; Vanessa Prox-Vagedes; Gregor R Szycik; Mandy Roy; Frank Donnerstag; Hinderk M Emrich; Martin D Ohlmeier
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2010-04-19

8.  Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Mark A Bellgrove; Ian C Gould; Therese English; Hugh Garavan; Elizabeth McNaught; Marc Kamke; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations.

Authors:  Archy O de Berker; Marom Bikson; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Task-induced brain activity in aphasic stroke patients: what is driving recovery?

Authors:  Fatemeh Geranmayeh; Sonia L E Brownsett; Richard J S Wise
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  3 in total

1.  No effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual evoked potential and peak gamma frequency.

Authors:  A Bin Dawood; A Dickinson; A Aytemur; E Milne; M Jones
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-01-31

2.  More than skin deep: about the influence of self-relevant avatars on inhibitory control.

Authors:  Maximilian A Friehs; Martin Dechant; Sarah Schäfer; Regan L Mandryk
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-04-08

3.  Multitarget high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation improves response inhibition more than single-target high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.

Authors:  Zhihua Guo; Yue Gong; Hongliang Lu; Rui Qiu; Xinlu Wang; Xia Zhu; Xuqun You
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.