Literature DB >> 22532165

Modulating behavioral inhibition by tDCS combined with cognitive training.

Thomas Ditye1, Liron Jacobson, Vincent Walsh, Michal Lavidor.   

Abstract

Cognitive training is an effective tool to improve a variety of cognitive functions, and a small number of studies have now shown that brain stimulation accompanying these training protocols can enhance their effects. In the domain of behavioral inhibition, little is known about how training can affect this skill. As for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), it was previously found that stimulation over the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) facilitates behavioral inhibition performance and modulates its electrophysiological correlates. This study aimed to investigate this behavioral facilitation in the context of a learning paradigm by giving tDCS over rIFG repetitively over four consecutive days of training on a behavioral inhibition task (stop signal task (SST)). Twenty-two participants took part; ten participants were assigned to receive anodal tDCS (1.5 mA, 15 min), 12 were assigned to receive training but not active stimulation. There was a significant effect of training on learning and performance in the SST, and the integration of the training and rIFG-tDCS produced a more linear learning slope. Better performance was also found in the active stimulation group. Our findings show that tDCS-combined cognitive training is an effective tool for improving the ability to inhibit responses. The current study could constitute a step toward the use of tDCS and cognitive training as a therapeutic tool for cognitive control impairments in conditions such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22532165     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3098-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Paul C Fletcher; Ed T Bullmore; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Imaging response inhibition in a stop-signal task: neural correlates independent of signal monitoring and post-response processing.

Authors:  Chiang-shan Ray Li; Cong Huang; R Todd Constable; Rajita Sinha
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Improved driving performance following perceptual training in persons with brain damage.

Authors:  M Sivak; C S Hill; D L Henson; B P Butler; S M Silber; P L Olson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Training of working memory in children with ADHD.

Authors:  Torkel Klingberg; Hans Forssberg; Helena Westerberg
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.475

7.  An event-related potential investigation of response inhibition in schizophrenia and psychopathy.

Authors:  K A Kiehl; A M Smith; R D Hare; P F Liddle
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Response-inhibition deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an indicator of dysfunction in frontostriatal circuits.

Authors:  D R Rosenberg; E L Dick; K M O'Hearn; J A Sweeney
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.186

9.  Computerized progressive attentional training (CPAT) program: effective direct intervention for children with ADHD.

Authors:  Lilach Shalev; Yehoshua Tsal; Carmel Mevorach
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Modulating presence and impulsiveness by external stimulation of the brain.

Authors:  Gian Beeli; Gianclaudio Casutt; Thomas Baumgartner; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  63 in total

1.  Vocal response inhibition is enhanced by anodal tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Neuromodulation interventions for addictive disorders: challenges, promise, and roadmap for future research.

Authors:  Primavera A Spagnolo; David Goldman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Augmenting cognitive training in older adults (The ACT Study): Design and Methods of a Phase III tDCS and cognitive training trial.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Ronald Cohen; Michael Marsiske; Gene E Alexander; Sara J Czaja; Samuel Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 4.  Is neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation a net zero-sum proposition?

Authors:  Anna-Katharine Brem; Peter J Fried; Jared C Horvath; Edwin M Robertson; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates response inhibition through dynamic modulation of the fronto-basal ganglia network.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Benjamin Xu; Rita Volochayev; Oluwole Awosika; Wen-Tung Wang; John A Butman; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Transcranial direct current brain stimulation decreases impulsivity in ADHD.

Authors:  Cheyenne Allenby; Mary Falcone; Leah Bernardo; E Paul Wileyto; Anthony Rostain; J Russell Ramsay; Caryn Lerman; James Loughead
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Assessing the effects of tDCS over a delayed response inhibition task by targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Davide Francesco Stramaccia; Barbara Penolazzi; Giulia Sartori; Miriam Braga; Sara Mondini; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Frontoparietal neurostimulation modulates working memory training benefits and oscillatory synchronization.

Authors:  Kevin T Jones; Dwight J Peterson; Kara J Blacker; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance cognitive training: effect of timing of stimulation.

Authors:  Donel M Martin; Rose Liu; Angelo Alonzo; Melissa Green; Colleen K Loo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Improving Naming Abilities Among Healthy Young-Old Adults Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Adi Lifshitz-Ben-Basat; Nira Mashal
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.