Literature DB >> 35099659

No effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual evoked potential and peak gamma frequency.

A Bin Dawood1, A Dickinson2, A Aytemur3, E Milne4, M Jones4.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the visual evoked potential (VEP) and gamma oscillations elicited by visual stimuli reflect the balance of excitatory and inhibitory (E-I) cortical processes. As tDCS has been shown to modulate E-I balance, the current study investigated whether amplitudes of VEP components (N1 and P2) and peak gamma frequency are modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Healthy adults underwent two electroencephalography (EEG) recordings while viewing stimuli designed to elicit a robust visual response. Between the two recordings, participants were randomly assigned to three tDCS conditions (anodal-, cathodal-, and sham-tDCS) or received no-tDCS. tDCS electrodes were placed over the occipital cortex (Oz) and the left cheek with an intensity of 2 mA for 10 min. Data of 39 participants were analysed for VEP amplitudes and peak gamma frequency using mixed-model ANOVAs. The results showed no main effects of tDCS in any metric. Possible explanations for the absence of tDCS effects are discussed.
© 2022. Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Excitation-inhibition balance; Neuromodulation; Peak gamma frequency; Visual evoked potential; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35099659     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-022-01076-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  108 in total

1.  External modulation of visual perception in humans.

Authors:  A Antal; M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Modulation of moving phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation of V1 in human.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Tamás Z Kincses; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Visual evoked potentials modulation during direct current cortical polarization.

Authors:  Neri Accornero; Pietro Li Voti; Maurizio La Riccia; Bruno Gregori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation and visual perception.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Contrast dependency of motion-onset and pattern-reversal VEPs: interaction of stimulus type, recording site and response component.

Authors:  M Bach; D Ullrich
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Differential sensory cortical involvement in auditory and visual sensorimotor temporal recalibration: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Ali Aytemür; Nathalia Almeida; Kwang-Hyuk Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on experimentally induced heat pain.

Authors:  Per M Aslaksen; Olena Vasylenko; Asbjørn J Fagerlund
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Tamás Z Kincses; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Functional network connectivity during rest and task conditions: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mohammad R Arbabshirani; Martin Havlicek; Kent A Kiehl; Godfrey D Pearlson; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.