Literature DB >> 17942624

Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex.

Christopher D Chambers1, Mark A Bellgrove, Ian C Gould, Therese English, Hugh Garavan, Elizabeth McNaught, Marc Kamke, Jason B Mattingley.   

Abstract

Intelligent behavior depends on the ability to suppress inappropriate actions and resolve interference between competing responses. Recent clinical and neuroimaging evidence has demonstrated the involvement of prefrontal, parietal, and premotor areas during behaviors that emphasize conflict and inhibition. It remains unclear, however, whether discrete subregions within this network are crucial for overseeing more specific inhibitory demands. Here we probed the functional specialization of human prefrontal cortex by combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with integrated behavioral measures of response inhibition (stop-signal task) and response competition (flanker task). Participants undertook a combined stop-signal/flanker task after rTMS of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) or dorsal premotor cortex (dPM) in each hemisphere. Stimulation of the right IFG impaired stop-signal inhibition under conditions of heightened response competition but did not influence the ability to suppress a competing response. In contrast, stimulation of the right dPM facilitated execution but had no effect on inhibition. Neither of these results was observed during rTMS of corresponding left-hemisphere regions. Overall, our findings are consistent with existing evidence that the right IFG is crucial for inhibitory control. The observed double dissociation of neurodisruptive effects between the right IFG and right dPM further implies that response inhibition and execution rely on distinct neural processes despite activating a common cortical network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17942624     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00685.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  91 in total

1.  Functional parcellation of the inferior frontal and midcingulate cortices in a flanker-stop-change paradigm.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Tom Eichele; Karsten Specht; Harald Kugel; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Perceptual and motor-based responses to hand actions on objects: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Eun Young Yoon; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron; Michaël A Stevens; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  When response inhibition is followed by response reengagement: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Maren Boecker; Barbara Drueke; Verena Vorhold; Andre Knops; Bernd Philippen; Siegfried Gauggel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Vocal response inhibition is enhanced by anodal tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A causal role of the right inferior frontal cortex in implementing strategies for multi-component behaviour.

Authors:  Gabriel Dippel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Acute effects of cocaine on the neurobiology of cognitive control.

Authors:  Hugh Garavan; Jacqueline N Kaufman; Robert Hester
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Chronometric electrical stimulation of right inferior frontal cortex increases motor braking.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Christopher R Conner; Adam R Aron; Nitin Tandon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Too little, too late or too much, too early? Differential hemodynamics of response inhibition in high and low sensation seekers.

Authors:  Heather R Collins; Christine R Corbly; Xun Liu; Thomas H Kelly; Donald Lynam; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.