| Literature DB >> 33389362 |
Jurate Bidviene1,2, Denisa Muraru3,4, Francesco Maffessanti5, Egle Ereminiene6,7, Attila Kovács8, Bálint Lakatos8, Jolanta-Justina Vaskelyte6,7, Remigijus Zaliunas6, Elena Surkova9, Gianfranco Parati3,4, Luigi P Badano3,4.
Abstract
Our aim was to assess the regional right ventricular (RV) shape changes in pressure and volume overload conditions and their relations with RV function and mechanics. The end-diastolic and end-systolic RV endocardial surfaces were analyzed with three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) in 33 patients with RV volume overload (rToF), 31 patients with RV pressure overload (PH), and 60 controls. The mean curvature of the RV inflow (RVIT) and outflow (RVOT) tracts, RV apex and body (both divided into free wall (FW) and septum) were measured. Zero curvature defined a flat surface, whereas positive or negative curvature indicated convexity or concavity, respectively. The longitudinal and radial RV wall motions were also obtained. rToF and PH patients had flatter FW (body and apex) and RVIT, more convex interventricular septum (body and apex) and RVOT than controls. rToF demonstrated a less bulging interventricular septum at end-systole than PH patients, resulting in a more convex shape of the RVFW (r = - 0.701, p < 0.0001), and worse RV longitudinal contraction (r = - 0.397, p = 0.02). PH patients showed flatter RVFW apex at end-systole compared to rToF (p < 0.01). In both groups, a flatter RVFW apex was associated with worse radial RV contraction (r = 0.362 in rToF, r = 0.482 in PH at end-diastole, and r = 0.555 in rToF, r = 0.379 in PH at end-systole, respectively). In PH group, the impairment of radial contraction was also related to flatter RVIT (r = 0.407) and more convex RVOT (r = - 0.525) at end-systole (p < 0.05). In conclusion, different loading conditions are associated to specific RV curvature changes, that are related to longitudinal and radial RV dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: 3D echocardiography; Pulmonary hypertension; Regional curvature; Right ventricular function; Right ventricular shape; Tetralogy of Fallot
Year: 2021 PMID: 33389362 PMCID: PMC8026459 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-02117-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357
Fig. 1The 3D endocardial surface of the right ventricle (RV) was segmented in 4 subvolumes: inflow (RVIT) and outflow (RVOT) tracts, RV apex and body. The RV apex and body were further subdivided into free wall and septal components
Fig. 2Global function (a) and decomposed longitudinal (b) and radial (c) wall motions of the right ventricle in pulmonary hypertension (PH) and repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rToF) patients, and a normal subject
Baseline clinical characteristics, left and right ventricular geometry and function of the study patients and controls
| Characteristics, LV and RV parameters | rToF | Control-rToF (N = 30) | PH | Control-PH (N = 30) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 20 ± 8 | 21 ± 6 | 57 ± 14† | 57 ± 11 |
| Women, n (%) | 19 (58) | 19 (63) | 24 (77) † | 22 (73) |
| Body surface area (m2) | 1.6 ± 0.23 | 1.8 ± 0.26* | 1.8 ± 0.16† | 1.7 ± 0.2 |
| LV end-diastolic volume (ml/m2) | 75 ± 13 | 65 ± 12* | 63 ± 14† | 57 ± 10 |
| LV end-systolic volume (ml/m2) | 32 ± 7 | 25 ± 6* | 21 ± 11† | 20 ± 4 |
| LV EF (%) | 58 ± 4 | 62 ± 4* | 62 ± 7† | 65 ± 3* |
| Pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (mmHg) | 32 ± 7 | 21 ± 5* | 58 ± 15† | 21 ± 4* |
| RV free-wall S′ (cm/s) | 10 ± 2 | 15 ± 2* | 11 ± 3† | 14 ± 2* |
| TAPSE (mm) | 18 ± 3 | 25 ± 4* | 21 ± 5† | 26 ± 3* |
| RV fractional area change (%) | 37 ± 5 | 49 ± 7* | 26 ± 7† | 51 ± 6* |
| Basal RV diameter (mm) | 51 ± 10 | 37 ± 3* | 50 ± 8 | 36 ± 4* |
| Mid-cavity RV diameter (mm) | 47 ± 9 | 27 ± 3* | 42 ± 8† | 26 ± 5* |
| RV long-axis diameter (mm) | 87 ± 10 | 69 ± 8* | 79 ± 7† | 66 ± 7* |
| RV end-diastolic volume (ml/m2) | 133 ± 34 | 52 ± 18* | 95 ± 22† | 58 ± 13* |
| RV end-systolic volume (ml/m2) | 74 ± 24 | 24 ± 10* | 61 ± 20† | 24 ± 6* |
| RV EF (%) | 45 ± 6 | 55 ± 5* | 36 ± 8† | 59 ± 7* |
| Longitudinal RV EF (%) | 17 ± 4 | 28 ± 4* | 18 ± 5 | 25 ± 5* |
| Radial RV EF (%) | 20 ± 5 | 25 ± 4* | 13 ± 5† | 27 ± 6* |
| Ratio of longitudinal to global RV EF | 0.39 ± 0.09 | 0.52 ± 0.05* | 0.51 ± 0.12† | 0.46 ± 0.07 |
| Ratio of radial to global RV EF | 0.45 ± 0.08 | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 0.35 ± 0.11† | 0.48 ± 0.07* |
EF ejection fraction, LV left ventricular, PH pulmonary hypertension, rToF repaired tetralogy of Fallot, RV right ventricular, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
*p < 0.05 comparing rToF and PH with controls; †p < 0.05 comparing rToF and PH
Global and regional right ventricular volumes and curvature parameters in study patients and controls measured at end-diastole and end-systole
| Parameters | End-diastole | End-systole | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rToF (n = 33) | Control-rToF | PH | Control-PH | rToF (n = 33) | Control-rToF | PH | Control-PH | |
| RV volume (ml/m2) | 130 ± 33 | 66 ± 16* | 95 ± 23† | 66 ± 14* | 74 ± 24 | 30 ± 9* | 62 ± 21 † | 31 ± 8* |
| RV apex (ml/m2) | 21 ± 5 | 10 ± 3* | 15 ± 4† | 10 ± 2* | 11 ± 4 | 4 ± 1* | 9 ± 3 † | 4 ± 1* |
| RV body (ml/m2) | 50 ± 13 | 25 ± 6* | 36 ± 9† | 25 ± 5* | 28 ± 9 | 12 ± 4* | 24 ± 8 † | 12 ± 3* |
| RVIT (ml/m2) | 36 ± 10 | 18 ± 4* | 27 ± 6† | 18 ± 4* | 21 ± 7 | 8 ± 3* | 17 ± 6 † | 9 ± 2* |
| RVOT (ml/m2) | 24 ± 6 | 12 ± 3* | 18 ± 4† | 12 ± 3* | 14 ± 5 | 6 ± 2* | 12 ± 4 | 6 ± 1* |
| Curvature (indexed to volume) | ||||||||
| RVIT | 1.14 ± 0.1 | 1.23 ± 0.1* | 1.19 ± 0.1 | 1.32 ± 0.3* | 1.19 ± 0.1 | 1.13 ± 0.2 | 1.16 ± 0.1 | 1.25 ± 0.1* |
| RVOT | 1.52 ± 0.1 | 1.44 ± 0.1* | 1.49 ± 0.1 | 1.40 ± 0.1* | 1.44 ± 0.1 | 1.28 ± 0.1* | 1.43 ± 0.1 | 1.31 ± 0.1* |
| RV free-wall | 1.36 ± 0.1 | 1.43 ± 0.1* | 1.36 ± 0.1 | 1.42 ± 0.1* | 1.37 ± 0.1 | 1.34 ± 0.1 | 1.29 ± 0.1† | 1.35 ± 0.1* |
| Free-wall RV body | 1.08 ± 0.1 | 1.20 ± 0.1* | 1.09 ± 0.1 | 1.16 ± 0.1* | 1.06 ± 0.1 | 1.16 ± 0.1* | 1.01 ± 0.1† | 1.09 ± 0.1* |
| Free-wall RV apex | 1.95 ± 0.2 | 2.40 ± 0.2* | 2.02 ± 0.3 | 2.34 ± 0.2* | 2.05 ± 0.3 | 2.34 ± 0.2* | 1.85 ± 0.2† | 2.29 ± 0.2* |
| Interventricular septum | 0.68 ± 0.1 | 0.60 ± 0.1* | 0.69 ± 0.1 | 0.59 ± 0.1 | 0.66 ± 0.1 | 0.55 ± 0.1* | 0.76 ± 0.1† | 0.58 ± 0.1* |
| Septal RV body | 0.40 ± 0.1 | 0.14 ± 0.1* | 0.32 ± 0.1 † | 0.18 ± 0.1* | 0.37 ± 0.2 | 0.15 ± 0.1* | 0.46 ± 0.1† | 0.2 ± 0.1* |
| Septal RV apex | 1.01 ± 0.3 | 0.54 ± 0.3* | 0.98 ± 0.3 | 0.38 ± 0.2* | 1.14 ± 0.4 | 0.62 ± 0.4* | 1.19 ± 0.5 | 0.46 ± 0.3* |
PH pulmonary hypertension, rToF repaired tetralogy of Fallot, RV right ventricle, RVIT right ventricular inflow tract, RVOT right ventricular outflow tract
*p < 0.05 comparing rToF and PH with controls; †p < 0.05 comparing rToF and PH
Fig. 3Colour-coded map of mean 3D curvature values obtained in repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rToF) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients, and a normal subject at end-diastole (a) and end-systole (b). Blue denotes more concave surface and red denotes more convex. In rToF and PH patients, the right ventricular free wall is flatter, and the interventricular septum is more convex compared to normal subject throughout the cardiac cycle. In rToF, the interventricular septum curvature is more convex at end-diastole (a) comparing with PH patients, but this relationship is inverted at end-systole (b)
Fig. 4Bar graphs comparing end-diastolic (a) and end-systolic (b) regional curvature values for the patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rToF, blue bars) and patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH, orange bars). IS interventricular septum, RV right ventricular, RVIT right ventricular inflow tract, RVOT right ventricular outflow tract. *p < 0.05
Dynamic RV shape changes from end-diastole to end-systole in rToF and PH patients
| Curvature (indexed to volume) | Change in curvature (Delta) from end-diastole | |
|---|---|---|
| rToF (n = 33) | PH (n = 31) | |
| RVIT | − 0.05 ± 0.06 | 0.02 ± 0.08* |
| RVOT | 0.08 ± 0.09 | 0.06 ± 0.06 |
| RV free wall | − 0.01 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.04* |
| Free-wall RV body | 0.02 ± 0.06 | 0.08 ± 0.06* |
| Free-wall RV apex | − 0.10 ± 0.22 | 0.17 ± 0.15* |
| Interventricular septum | 0.03 ± 0.09 | − 0.07 ± 0.09* |
| Septal RV body | 0.02 ± 0.11 | − 0.14 ± 0.10* |
| Septal RV apex | − 0.12 ± 0.26 | − 0.21 ± 0.26 |
PH pulmonary hypertension, rToF repaired tetralogy of Fallot, RV right ventricle, RVIT right ventricular inflow tract, RVOT right ventricular outflow tract. *p < 0.0001