| Literature DB >> 35127866 |
Ayah Elsayed1, Charlène A Mauger1, Edward Ferdian1, Kathleen Gilbert2, Miriam Scadeng1, Christopher J Occleshaw3, Boris S Lowe3, Andrew D McCulloch4, Jeffrey H Omens4, Sachin Govil4, Kuberan Pushparajah5, Alistair A Young1,5.
Abstract
Remodeling in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rToF) may occur due to chronic pulmonary regurgitation, but may also be related to altered flow patterns, including vortices. We aimed to correlate and quantify relationships between vorticity and ventricular shape derived from atlas-based analysis of biventricular shape. Adult rToF (n = 12) patients underwent 4D flow and cine MRI imaging. Vorticity in the RV was computed after noise reduction using a neural network. A biventricular shape atlas built from 95 rToF patients was used to derive principal component modes, which were associated with vorticity and pulmonary regurgitant volume (PRV) using univariate and multivariate linear regression. Univariate analysis showed that indexed PRV correlated with 3 modes (r = -0.55,-0.50, and 0.6, all p < 0.05) associated with RV dilatation and an increase in basal bulging, apical bulging and tricuspid annulus tilting with more severe regurgitation, as well as a smaller LV and paradoxical movement of the septum. RV outflow and inflow vorticity were also correlated with these modes. However, total vorticity over the whole RV was correlated with two different modes (r = -0.62,-0.69, both p < 0.05). Higher vorticity was associated with both RV and LV shape changes including longer ventricular length, a larger bulge beside the tricuspid valve, and distinct tricuspid tilting. RV flow vorticity was associated with changes in biventricular geometry, distinct from associations with PRV. Flow vorticity may provide additional mechanistic information in rToF remodeling. Both LV and RV shapes are important in rToF RV flow patterns.Entities:
Keywords: 4D flow; atlas; shape; tetralogy of Fallot; vorticity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35127866 PMCID: PMC8813860 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.806107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Demographics and cardiac parameters (mean ± s.d).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 32.4 ± 11.2 | 32.3 ± 11.2 | 19.5 ± 12.7 |
| Sex Male: Female | 5:5 | 5:7 | 57:38 |
| Height (cm) | 173 ± 8.7 | 168.6 ± 8.6 | 154.7 ± 19.7 |
| Weight (kg) | 78 ± 20.6 | 71 ± 12.2 | 58 ± 26.0 |
| BSA (m2) | 1.9 ± 0.27 | 1.8 ± 0.15 | 1.5 |
| PRV (ml/cycle) | 1.5 ± 1.70 | 17.1 ± 21.07 | 20.8 ± 11.8 |
| TRV (ml/cycle) | 0.11 ± 0.34 | 1.06 ± 1.36 | NA |
| LV EDVi (ml/m2) | 85.5 ± 17.2 | 90.9 ± 23.2 | 78 ± 14 |
| LV SVi (ml/m2) | 45.3 ± 8.15 | 44.2 ± 10.3 | 37.1 ± 8.0 |
| LV mass index (g/m2) | 60.1 ± 8.0 | 57.9 ± 5.1 | 76 ± 14 |
| RV EDVi (ml/m2) | 92.8 ± 13.3 | 112.6 ± 20.4 | 147 ± 14 |
| RV SVi (ml/m2) | 41.3 ± 8.6 | 45.7 ± 14.8 | 52.9 ± 14.8 |
| RV mass index (g/m2) | 30.5 ± 4.7 | 36.2 ± 12.7 | 42 ± 11 |
| RV ESVi (ml/m2) | 51.4 ± 7.3 | 66.8 ± 11.7 | 90 ± 27 |
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01 rToF vs. volunteers,
p < 0.05 rToF vs. rToF Atlas; BSA, body surface area; EDVi, indexed end diastolic volume; ESVi, indexed end systolic volume; LV, Left ventricle; PRV, pulmonary regurgitation volume; SD, standard deviation; SVi, indexed stroke volume; TR, tricuspid regurgitation; NA, not available.
Figure 1Diagrammatic representation of the methodology. 4D flow (A) was used for volumetric quantification of flow in the pulmonary and across the tricuspid valve (B) and velocity data was processed with the 4D flow neural network (C). Vorticity (D) was quantified and visualized with the vortex core and streamlines that demonstrate velocity within the spherical ROI was shown, and the dotted line represents the opening of the tricuspid valve. Cines (E) were used to extract EDV, ESV and SV (F). Cines were also used to build the models for the current population that were projected onto the atlas (G). Regression models (H) were used to compute shape variations associated with vorticity. The figure shows an overlapping of the diagrams of a normal biventricular model and the model generated to show the effect of vorticity.
Figure 2Qualitative (left) and quantitative (right) evaluation of velocity and vorticity with and without the 4DFlownet. The panels show the 3 regions of interest where vorticity was captured (left: whole RV; middle: RVOT; right: tricuspid inflow in diastole. The network reduced noise making the vorticity structure more readily visualized. Right plots show mean vorticity calculated in the region of interest and mean velocity calculated at planes positioned in the RVOT, showing high correlation before and after 4DFlowNet.
Vorticity in the volunteer and study groups.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| RV vorticity | 23.5 ± 6.5 | 25.5 ± 5.9 | 0.59 |
| Tricuspid vorticity | 23.5 ± 6.5 | 20.6 ± 5.4 | 0.35 |
| RVOT vorticity | 5.12 ± 1.9 | 10.4 ± 5.5 | 0.006 |
t-test is significant at P < 0.05,
vorticity is measured in (1/s)/100. Vorticity was measured across multiple timeframes and averaged over the diastolic phase.
Figure 3Correlations of cardiac indices and vorticity with principal component analysis modes. PRVi, indexed pulmonary regurgitant volume; LVM, left ventricular mass; LVEDVi, indexed left ventricular end diastolic volume; LVSVi, indexed left ventricular stroke volume; LVESVi, indexed left ventricular end systolic volume; MVR, mass to volume ratio. Modes 9 and 6 Are the most correlated modes with aspects of cardiac metrics and vorticity. Bonferroni correction was done with all correlations.
Figure 4Principal component shape variations associated with pulmonary regurgitant volume (top) and vorticity (bottom). The RV is shown in purple, left ventricle: green, the tricuspid valve: pink, the pulmonary valve: neon green, the aortic valve: yellow and mitral valve: blue. Each mode is shown in an anterior and posterior view with description below.
Figure 5The effect of vorticity on the shape of the RV by a regression model. The spectrum of shapes is demonstrated in the line of shapes above to show the difference between a normal biventricular model (far right) and a model affected by high vorticity (far left). The larger overlapping shapes emphasize the differences. The RV enlargement affects the orientation of both the pulmonary and tricuspid valves. There is an architectural shift from the normal configuration to an enlarged bulging base. There is an evident effect on the LV as well showing the change in wall shape and position of the aortic and mitral valves due to the shift in the RV outflow tract configuration.